HOW CONVERSATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS FROM DIFFERENT FIELDS SHAPED THE PROJECT AND PRODUCT DESIGN
In the ever-evolving field of synthetic biology, achieving groundbreaking innovations goes beyond doing experiments in the lab. For our project, the impact is harnessed via interviews with experts from various fields, using this knowledge to reflect on decisions, identifying areas of improvements, and realizing these improvements into our project.
Our project inspiration stems from the pressing global need for sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics. Microplastic pollution in the environment is an ever-increasing concern, with significant amounts of microplastics ending up in the food-chain1. Agricultural plastic waste, such as non-degradable fertilizer coatings, is a large contributor to this problem2. Recent studies have highlighted the alarming presence of microplastics in human blood and feces, as well as in embryos, raising health concerns3. In the face of this growing crisis, there is an urgent need for an effective solution. Our project aims to address this need by harnessing the potential of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), biodegradable polymers produced by bacteria, to create eco-friendly alternatives that can mitigate plastic pollution and reduce our environmental footprint.
To ensure that our project aligns with societal needs and ethical standards, we contacted various stakeholders. Through these collaborative efforts, we have aimed to bridge the gap between scientific research and societal needs, ensuring that our project effectively tackles the real-world challenge of microplastics, while upholding the principles of sustainable innovation.
In the initial stages of our project, we conducted interviews with stakeholders that were crucial for transforming our initial idea to a concrete and viable project We classified our stakeholders in six different categories, all of which are sorted in chronological order.
1. Identifying the problem 
In this category, we
              focused on identifying the problem of microplastic pollution in agriculture and
              the environment. Microplastics pose a significant threat to both food safety and
              ecosystem health. By understanding the extent of this issue and its
              implications, we gained insights into the urgency and importance of finding a
              
            sustainable solution
             Identifying the problem allowed us to set clear objectives for our project and establish its relevance
            in addressing this global concern.
2. Finding a solution 
We recognized that the
              conventional use of petroleum-based plastics in agriculture was contributing to
              microplastic pollution. Therefore, we aimed to develop a viable alternative
              through the production of biodegradable plastic using genetically engineered
              bacteria. This category of stakeholders enabled us to explore various techniques
              and technologies to tackle the problem effectively, considering both the
              technical feasibility and
              
            environmental impact
             of our solution by interacting with many experts in these relevant scientific
              fields.
3. Safety 
              
              Safety
               was a big concern
              throughout our project development. To safeguard team members and the
              environment from potential risks associated with chemicals and equipment, we had
              to make sure that our extraction procedure was safe.  To ensure that the use of
              PHA plastic in agriculture did not harm crops, soil, humans, or ecosystems, it
              was also crucial to evaluate the safety of the material itself. By prioritizing
              safety at every step, we aimed to deliver an innovative solution that not only
              addressed sustainability challenges but also upheld the highest standards of
              safety and environmental responsibility. 
4. Modeling 
              
              Modeling
               played a crucial
              role in our project as it allowed us to predict and optimize the behavior of our
              engineered strains. By creating mathematical models, we could simulate the
              growth and PHA production of various mutants, aiding in the design and
              fine-tuning of our bioplastic production system in the lab. This category helped
              us bridge the gap between theory and experimentation, ensuring efficiency in our
              project. 
5. Extraction 
The extraction of PHA from bacterial
              cultures was a key technical aspect of our project. This category delved into
              the 
              
              methods and techniques
               we used to extract and purify the
              biodegradable plastic efficiently. By interviewing (PHA) extraction experts we
              gained a lot of valuable knowledge which we were able to apply in the lab.
              Addressing extraction challenges, we aimed to make PHA production economically
              viable and environmentally friendly, further supporting its adoption in
              agriculture.
6. Application 
The ultimate success of our project
              depends on its real-world application. In the application category, we explored
              how our biodegradable plastic could be integrated into agricultural practices to
              reduce microplastic pollution. Amongst others, we have talked to farmers,
              circular plastic experts, and regulatory organizations and discussed topics such
              as product durability, degradation rates, and compatibility with existing
              farming techniques. This category helped us envision the practical
              
              implementation
               and potential impact of our solution on
              agriculture, the environment, and public health.
Professor working at the Institute of Environmental Science (CML) in Leiden
Key points that influenced our project:
Professor of evolutionary developmental zoology.
Key points that influenced our project:
RIVM - Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment)
Key points that influenced our project:
Professor of Microbiology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and expert in the field of biotechnology.
Key points that influenced our project:
The head of microbial biotechnology at the DACHEMA research institute
Key points that influenced our project:
Assistant Professor at the Institute of Biology in Leiden.
Key points that influenced our project:
Assistant Professor at the Institute of Biology in Leiden.
Key points that influenced our project:
Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at HighTech XL, an accelerator for deep-tech startups.
Key points that influenced our project:
The head of R&D at Sotacarbo SpA, an R&D institute that works with the development of advanced low carbon energy conversion technologies.
Key points that influenced our project:
Work at the energy transition unit at TNO - Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Dutch Organisation for Applied Scientific Research).
Key points that influenced our project: