Reaction Kinetics Simulation
Introduction
Reaction kinetics simulation is a mathematical modeling method aimed at predicting the trends of
concentration of reactants or products with certain parameters by constructing a system with ordinary
differential equations. We simulated the cleavage process of CRISPR/Cas13a system with the Simbiology
toolbox in MATLAB[1]. By applying the
Michaelis-Menten equation, we simulated the cleavage
of reporter RNA by our engineered CRISPR/Cas13a system under different conditions.
Simulation of Michaelis-Menten equation
Once miR-21-5p binds to crRNA, it activates the cleavage activity of the Cas13a/crRNA complex, which
cleaves not only miR-21-5p but also other RNA. Therefore, the Cas13a/crRNA/miRNA ternary complex can be
treated as an enzyme with RNA cleavage activity. We use a fluorophore (Carboxyfluorescein, FAM) and a
quenching group (Black hole quencher, BHQ1) dual-labeled 6U oligonucleotides as a reporter RNA to
evaluate the cleavage efficiency of the Cas13a/crRNA/miRNA ternary complex, since cleavage of the
reporter RNA results in the release of fluorescence quenched by BHQ1, which can be measured easily. Such
process can be simplified as the reaction below.
The positive reaction rate constant for the binding reaction between the Cas13a/crRNA/miRNA ternary
complex and the reporter RNA is k1, the reverse reaction rate constant is k2, and the reaction rate
constant for fluorescence generated by cleavage is k3. We can use Michaelis-Menten equation to study the
rate of cleavage activities[2].
\[
v_0 = \dfrac{dF}{dt} = \dfrac{V_m[S]}{K_m+[S]}
\]
\(v_0\) represents reaction rate, which is experimentally expressed as the rate of increase in
fluorescence
intensity, and [S] represents the concentration of the substrate, which is the reporter RNA. In actual
reactions, fluorescence gradually degrades. Therefore, the equation can be rewritten as below.
In this equation, the \(k_{cleavage}\) represents the rate of the enzyme activity, which is the cleavage
activity of Cas13a/crRNA/miRNA complex in our case. \(k_{cleavage} = k3\), \( K_m=\frac{k2+k3}{k1}\). We
set the initial concentration of the ternary complex as 20 nM and the initial concentration of the
reporter RNA as 1000 nM. The parameter settings are as follows.
\[
k1 = 10 nanomole^{-1} {hour}^{-1}
\]
\[
k2 = 0.1 {hour}^{-1}
\]
\[
k3 = 1000 {hour}^{-1}
\]
\[
r = 0.5{minute}^{-1}
\]
By changing the initial concentration of substrate, enzyme, and the values of different parameters, the
following simulation results can be obtained.
Figure 1: Curves of fluorescence production with different association rate
constants
Figure 2: Curves of fluorescence production with different decomposition
rates
Figure 3: Curves of fluorescence production with different degradation
constants
Figure 4: Curves of fluorescence production with different reporter RNA
concentrations
It can be seen from (1) that the larger the forward reaction rate constants (\(k_1, k_3\)), the faster
the fluorescence reaches its peak. The larger the degradation constant, the faster the fluorescence
reaches its peak. Considering the degradation of fluorescence, the fluorescence intensity ultimately
tends to zero. Since the main difference in actual reactions is the miRNA concentration, and under
physiological conditions miRNA will not be saturated. Therefore we use miRNA concentration to represent
the concentration of the ternary complex in our model. Setting the r value to 0.1 and changing the
initial concentration of the ternary complex, the following curves are obtained.
Figure 5: Curves of fluorescence production with different ternary complex
concentrations
Considering fluorescence degradation, there is an approximate linear relationship between fluorescence
intensity and miRNA concentration within a large range of miRNA concentration (Figure 5).
Experimental validation
An effective model should fit the results of experiments, so we validated the model through
experimental data. Fluorescence was measured from the actual experiments (Figure 6 & 7). In figure 6,
the concentrations of crRNA, LwaCas13a, and miRNA were 20 nM, 100 nM, 50 nM respectively. In figure 7,
the concentrations of crRNA, LwaCas13a, and reporter RNA were 20nM, 100nM and 100nM respectively.
Figure 6: Fluorescence intensity measured at different times with different
concentrations of reporter RNA
Figure 7: Fluorescence intensity measured with different concentrations of
miR-21-5p
In Figure 7, from 0 to 100 nm of miRNA, the fluorescence intensity increased with the increased
concentration of miRNA, and it reached a peak at 100 nm of miRNA, indicating that the formation of
Cas13a/crRNA/miRNA ternary complex were likely saturated by 100 nm of miRNA. Subsequently, as the
concentration of miRNA increased to above 100 nm, the excess miRNA competed against reporter RNA as the
substrate of the ternary complex, and suppressed the cleavage on reporter RNA, which decreased the
fluorescence intensity.
In the increasing part of the fluorescence curve, r can be ignored, and taking the reciprocal on both
sides of the equation yields the following equation:
\[
\dfrac{1}{v_0} = \dfrac{K_m}{V_m}\dfrac{1}{[reporter]}+\dfrac{1}{V_m}
\]
Value before peak and fit it to obtain the following curve:
Figure 8: The fitting curve of Lineweaver-Burk
It can be seen that after using Lineweaver-Burk plot, the experiment results comply with the
Michaelis-Menten equation, which is consistent with our predictions
Conclusion
Both experiment results and reaction kinetics simulation demonstrate that our CRISPR/Cas13a system can
detect miR-21-5p at a large range of concentration. This feature of our CRISPR/Cas13a system is very
important, since the concentration of miR-21-5p might vary a lot in different person.
References
[1] MATLAB and Simbiology Toolbox Release 2020b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United
States.
[2] Ramachandran A, Santiago JG. CRISPR Enzyme Kinetics for Molecular Diagnostics. Anal Chem. 2021 May
25;93(20):7456-7464. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00525.