Engineering Success | SDU-CHINA - iGEM 2023

Engineering

2023 SDU-CHINA


  • Introduction

We aim to implement cell intelligence to boost the production of PHB. Cell intelligence (CI) refers to the automation of the production process, resulting in increased productivity and reduced costs. Our hardware and software have been specifically designed to attain this objective. We followed the DBTL principle, developed our three-layer dynamic regulation model.


  • Three-layer dynamic regulation model
  • 2.4 Three-Layer dynamic regulation model

The following combinations are transformed into both L19 and L31
Catalog Description length Name
01 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRwt-B0034-mKate-PYU3-BFP 2941bp BBa_K4583027
02 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRc-B0034-mKate-PYU3-BFP/td 2655bp BBa_K4583031
03 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRwt-B0034-mKate-PYU7-BFP 2944bp BBa_K4583032
04 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRc-B0034-mKate-PYU7-BFP 2658bp BBa_K4583033
05 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRp-B0034-mKate-PYU7-BFP 2944bp BBa_K4583034
06 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRwt-B0034-mKate-PYU92-BFP 2940bp BBa_K4583035
07 Composite PesaS-B0034-GFP-PesaRp-B0034-mKate-PYU16-BFP 2941bp BBa_K4583036

  • 1st iteration

  • Goal

Overall, we would like to divide the process of PHB production by E. coli into three stages: the growth stage, the production stage and the product release stage. In this way, E. coli can be fed first, and then work at full capacity; when their "stomach" is full of PHB, we crack it and release the products automatically. We plan to use the Esa I/R quorum sensing system to switch between growth and production phases. A promoter expressed in the late stationary phase, linked to a lysis gene, will be used to control bacterial lysis at the end of the production phase.


  • Design 1.0

Three-layer Dynamic Regulation Model

Fig.1: Schematic diagram of the Three-layer Dynamic Regulation Model
Fig.1 | Schematic diagram of the Three-layer Dynamic Regulation Model

Growth Phase and Production Phase

We chose to use the Esa I/R system to control the switch between Growth Phase and Production Phase. The EsaI/R QS system is homologous to the LuxI/R QS system, but EsaR can act as both transcriptional activator and repressor[1]. Our work was based on 3 strains that that already have the system (see Experiments for more details). At low cell density, the PesaR is turned off and the PesaS is turned on. At high cell density, the PesaR is turned on and the PesaS is turned off (see Experiments for more details). We firstly used fluorescence to characterize.

Fig.2: Genetic Circuit for Growth phase and Production Phase
Fig.2 | Genetic Circuit for Growth phase and Production Phase

Product-release Phase

We firstly used 4 stationary phase promoters (Pfic, P1.1, P2.1, P3.1)[2].

Fig.3: Genetic Circuit for product-release phase
Fig.3 | Genetic Circuit for product-release phase

  • Build 1.0
Transferring process

Combining the different plasmids and transferring them into E. coli, we obtained the following bacteria containing two plasmids.

These 6 strains are for QS- switch characterization:

  • These 6 strains are for QS- switch characterization

These 6 strains are for QS- switch characterization
Strains Plasmid 1 Plasmid 1 Name
pCL-PesaRwt-mkate L19SRw
L19 pCL-PesaS-GFP(LVA) pCL-PesaRc-mkate L19SRc
pCL-PesaRp-mkate L19SRp
pCL-PesaRwt-mkate L31SRw
L31 pCL-PesaS-GFP(LVA) pCL-PesaR-cmkate L31SRc
pCL-PesaRp-mkate L31SRp

The following combinations are transformed into both L19 and L31. The total number is 24.

  • The following combinations are transformed into both L19 and L31

The following combinations are transformed into both L19 and L31
Plasmid 1 Plasmid 2
PesaR Pfic P1.1 P2.1 P3.1
PesaR-wt RwF Rw1.1 Rw2.1 Rw3.1
PesaR-c RcF Rc1.1 Rc2.1 Rc3.1
PesaR-p RpF Rp1.1 Rp2.1 Rp3.1

  • Test 1.0

QS-switch Characterization

We used a Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (Synergy HT, Biotek, U.S.) to detect the fluorescence.

Fig.4: Characterization of QS-switch promoter
Fig.4 | Characterization of QS-switch promoter

We found that the characterization results for all six combinations were as expected: At low cell density, the PesaR is turned off and the PesaS is turned on, while at high cell density, the PesaR is turned on and the PesaS is turned off (see Experiments for more details).

Stationary Phase Promoter Characterization

Fig.5: Characterization of Pic, P1.1, P2.1, P3.1and PesaRwt, PesaRc, PesaRp
Fig.5 | Characterization of Pic, P1.1, P2.1, P3.1and PesaRwt, PesaRc, PesaRp

We found that combinations were not as expected: no significant temporal separation of expression occurred.


  • Learn 1.0

The QS system we use meets our needs, but the stationary phase promoter is expressed too early. We need to find the promoter that is expressed at late stationary phase.


  • 2nd iteration

  • Goal

In the 2nd iteration, we aimed to find promoters expressed in the late stationary phase and characterize them.


  • Design 2.0

This time, by reading scientific articles, we found four promoters expressed in the late stationary phase (PYU3, PYU7, PYU16, PYU92)[3].

Fig.6: Genetic circuit for the late stationary phase promoter
Fig.6 | Genetic circuit for the late stationary phase promoter

  • Build 2.0

Using the same steps in the 1st iteration build 1.0, we constructed the following 24 strains.

  • Our 24 strains

Our 24 strains
Plasmid 1 Plasmid 2
PesaR PYU3 PYU7 PYU16 PYU92
PesaR-wt PesaRwt-PYU3 PesaRwt-PYU7 PesaRwt-PYU16 PesaRwt-PYU92
PesaR-c PesaRc-PYU3 PesaRc-PYU7 PesaRc-PYU16 PesaRc-PYU92
PesaR-p PesaRp-PYU3 PesaRp-PYU7 PesaRp-PYU16 PesaRp-PYU92

  • Test 2.0

Stationary Phase Promoter Characterization—2.0

Fig.7: Some characterization results of PYU promoter and PesaR Fig.7: Some characterization results of PYU promoter and PesaR
Fig.7 | Some characterization results of PYU promoter and PesaR

These are the eleven groups out of 24 combinations that fulfilled the expected criteria: there was a significant difference in the expression times of the two promoters.


  • Learn 2.0

In the 2nd iteration, we find promoters that meet the need based on the results of the previous iteration and characterize them in our system. Out of 24 combinations, we found one combination that met the expectation. This means that each part of our model has been successfully characterized separately. We hope to further validate our system within the same bacteria, which will be more rigorous and scientific.


  • 3rd iteration

  • Goal

In the previous iterations, we have validated the feasibility of each component separately. However, our advisors pointed out that we need to characterize the individual components inside the same bacterium, which would be more rigorous and scientifically sound.


  • Design 3.0
Using BFP for characterization

In this iteration, we decide to transform 3 plasmids combinations into L19 and L31. We used BFP for characterization of PYU promoter.

Fig.8: Genetic circuit for the late stationary phase promoter (linked with BFP gene)
Fig.8 | Genetic circuit for the late stationary phase promoter (linked with BFP gene)

  • Build 3.0

We construct the following 10 strains that each contains 3 plasmids based on 1st and 2nd iteration:

  • Our 10 strains

Our 10 strains
No. Name Plasmid 1 Plasmid 2 Plasmid 3
01 L19-PesaS-PesaRwt-PYU3 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRwt PYU3
02 L19-PesaS-PesaRwt-PYU7 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRwt PYU7
03 L19-PesaS-PesaRwt-PYU92 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRwt PYU92
04 L19-PesaS-PesaRc-PYU3 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRc PYU3
05 L19-PesaS-PesaRc-PYU7 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRc PYU7
06 L19-PesaS-PesaRp-PYU7 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRp PYU7
07 L31-PesaS-PesaRwt-PYU3 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRwt PYU3
08 L31-PesaS-PesaRwt-PYU92 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRwt PYU92
09 L31-PesaS-PesaRp-PYU7 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRp PYU7
10 L31-PesaS-PesaRp-PYU16 pCL-PesaS pCL-PesaRp PYU16

  • Test 3.0

Three-Layer Dynamic Regulation Model Characterization

Here are the results:

Fig.9: Characterization results of Three-Layer Dynamic Regulation Model Characterization Fig.9: Characterization results of Three-Layer Dynamic Regulation Model Characterization
Fig.9 | Characterization results of Three-Layer Dynamic Regulation Model Characterization
Fig.10: The results of L19-PesaRwt-PYU3 strain
Fig.10 | The results of L19-PesaRwt-PYU3 strain

  • Learn 3.0

After three iterations, we successfully developed the model. This model worked well in E. coli MG1655. Subsequently, we applied it to the production of PHB.

  • References

Fig.6 The formula we use to assess our web accessibility

1. Minogue, T.D., et al., The autoregulatory role of EsaR, a quorum-sensing regulator in Pantoea stewartii ssp. stewartii: evidence for a repressor function. Mol Microbiol, 2002. 44(6): p. 1625-35.

2. Jaishankar, J. and P. Srivastava, Strong synthetic stationary phase promoter-based gene expression system for Escherichia coli. Plasmid, 2020. 109: p. 102491.

3. Talukder, A.A., et al., RpoS-dependent regulation of genes expressed at late stationary phase in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett, 1996. 386(2-3): p. 177-80.