While reading into SCFAs and gut health, we very quickly became aware of the important role nutrition
has on our immune system in general. To find out how widespread this knowledge is in society we
designed the questionnaire, a survey with 11 questions about eating habits, nutrition and the
influence it has on our overall health. The questionnaire exists in three different languages:
German (159 answers), English (14 answers) and Spanish (106 answers).
While the Spanish one was almost exclusively answered by people that live in Spain and the German
one only by people that live in Germany, Switzerland or Austria, the English one contains the
answers from all people that did neither speak German nor Spanish.
While looking at the results we have to keep in mind that the amount of people that answered the
questionnaire, as well as their main age, vary between the different groups. We will nevertheless
compare the questionnaire results of the three different groups with each other.
The first question refers to the age of the participants. In general most of the participants were either 18-35 or 36-65 years old with the English group being the overall youngest with >90% of participants being between 18 and 35 years old and the Spanish group being the oldest one with >65% between 36-65 years old.
In all countries, people seem to be generally aware that nutrition influences our immune system
and also seem to care about their eating behavior: More than 60% consider their diet as healthy.
The Intake of Supplementation is also very widespread, with an exception of Spain where the least
amount of people take it. In an additional field people were able to list the different kinds of
supplements they take and the most common transnational were Magnesium, Calcium and Iron.
Studies have shown that high consumption of red and processed meat can increase the risk of getting
Colorectal cancer1 and Ulcerative Colitis2 , which is why we asked our participants about their
weekly meat intake. Here, the answers differ between the three groups: While >85% of the Spanish
participants eat meat multiple times a week, for both the German and the English ones the meat
intake per week is lower. More than one quarter lives completely vegetarian and many more only eat
meat ones a week.
Considering those results, it is interesting to notice that the number of gut related diseases also
seems to be the highest in Spain. Here 11.3% have gut related diseases, while the number for
German- and English-speaking participants is only 7.1-7.5%.
Also, given that there has been reports alerting of an increase in the prevalence of allergic
diseases worldwide3,4 , we were interested in seeing how many people suffered a food
allergy or
intolerance currently and, perhaps, finding a link between an aberrant immune response towards
certain foods and the aberrant immune response characteristic of other gut diseases. Overall,
most of the participants (70.4% of the German, 84% of the Spanish and 92.9% of the English) do not
suffer from such illnesses. Of note, a few of the German participants answered the question
including other kinds of allergies such as rhinitis. Therefore, the percentage of German speaking
participants suffering food allergies or intolerances is not fully reliable.
When penicillin was discovered by Alexander Fleming, it helped to save countless lives that
would have died from bacterial infection without the correct treatment. However, while
antibiotics are indisputable one of the greatest discoveries that were made in medicine, it
also has its downsides. Studies that focussed on the gut microbiome after taking antibiotics
showed a generally strong decrease in diversity after exposure to antibiotics, which often is
not completely recovered after several months. Analyzing the different species of bacteria led
to the recognition that especially helpful members that provide critical metabolic functions
in the gut were decreased5. For people working in the field of medicine it is common knowledge
that antibiotics disrupt the gut microbiome and that the usage of this harsh treatment should
be limited as much as possible. To find out how widespread this knowledge is, we asked our
participants if they think that antibiotics disrupt the microbiota.
In general, only ~7% of the participants disagree with this statement, leading to the conclusion
that the populations are generally aware of that risk. Two third of the German- and
English-speaking people agree even strongly. In Spain, this number is a bit lower and more people
don’t agree as strongly, but the percentage of people that know the harmful influence of
antibiotics overall is the same.
As the last question, we wanted to know if there would be the desire for the politics to make
more nutrition-related policies to prevent malnutrition and obesity. Here, less than a quarter
wants to have more food policies with the exception of Spain where 26.4% of participants ‘agree’
or ‘strongly agree’.
Our everyday activities have an impact on various aspects of our lives, including our immune system. According to the people’s opinions, nutrition has the biggest impact on our immune system, whereas sports and sleeping habits have only a moderate or small impact on the immune system, respectively. This was true for all the different groups, proving the society’s knowledge about the important role of nutrition in the immune system’s health.
To bring to experience what people would consider a healthy diet, we asked to order the factors “Variety”, “Amount” and “Quality of products” by their importance. Once again, the results of all groups were merged. Overall, both variety and quality of products are considered to be important for a healthy diet. Interestingly, the answers differ for the different groups with variety being considered as the most important factor in Spain and quality of products being considered the most important in the German and English-speaking groups. However, for all the groups, the amount was the least important factor for a healthy diet.
In general, it seems that people of all groups care about their nutrition. This could be due
to an overall increase, in society, in interest towards diet. The growing amount of evidence
supporting relationships between nutrition and health and how certain diets, have an impact in
diseases like depression, cardiovascular disease or cancer, explains the increasing concern
about diet choices6,7. Also, the increasing prevalence of gut diseases8, could be behind
this increased interest towards nutrition.
Also, awareness towards some detrimental factors such as the usage of antibiotics, that have a
negative impact over the gut homeostasis, has been noticed. This is aligned by an increase in
scientific, medical and pharmaceutical efforts in explaining and communicating the risks that
come along with the intake of such medication9.
Nevertheless, we still have to keep in mind that this is not a scientific study, but just a
survey and therefore, it gives us only a hint on how much society knows about nutrition and
what their wishes would be. For us, the 7-11% of participants that suffer from gut-related
diseases highlight why an early diagnosis of a disrupted microbiome is important and motivated
us to develop a cheaper and more widespread, applicable tool for the detection of those changes.
At iGEM Erlangen, we firmly believe that meaningful scientific research extends beyond the lab. It involves understanding the human aspects that surround our project and actively seeking insights from experts in the field. Our human practice efforts took us on an enlightening journey, including a meeting with Prof. Zaiss. Here, we share the highlights of our interaction:
Our conversation with Prof. Zaiss was a hub of creative brainstorming. We contemplated several groundbreaking ideas related to our project, including:
Detecting SCFAs: We explored the notion of engineering bacteria to emit green fluorescence when they produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). This could serve as a fascinating indicator of an individual's microbiota competence, revealing their ability to produce SCFAs based on their diet and microbiota. We discussed the challenges of working with anaerobic bacteria and the potential adaptability of this protocol to different bacterial strains.
OMV Modification: We considered the intriguing prospect of using outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to express beneficial receptors for SCFAs in the intestine. However, we acknowledged that this approach posed technical challenges.
Enhancing SCFA Production: Our minds wandered to the idea of creating bacteria that could produce an abundance of SCFAs. This would involve overexpressing enzymes responsible for generating protective SCFAs while inhibiting those responsible for inflammatory SCFAs. Although this approach could potentially offer a way to alter SCFAs through dietary changes, it was deemed technically demanding.
Investigating SCFAs: We pondered the possibility of conducting experiments to measure the impact of different SCFAs on various cellular parameters, such as inflammatory cytokines and gut integrity. We even considered utilizing a "gut-on-chip" device to replicate the intestinal environment.
Mimicking SCFAs: Exploring the creation of SCFA agonists captured our attention. These agonists could provide an alternative to dietary changes, potentially involving collaboration with chemists or dry lab techniques to study how SCFA activity changes with these mimics.
Antibody-Based Approach: Another intriguing concept was the development of antibodies that activate SCFA receptors. This could offer assistance to individuals who struggle to consume a diet rich in SCFAs, such as celiac patients. These antibodies could be used alongside detection methods to identify cases where individuals lack sufficient SCFAs.
Prof. Zaiss emphasized the importance of initiating experiments that are not only innovative but also feasible. He encouraged us to establish a clear framework for each idea and suggested practical steps, such as growing E. coli with modified pathways to emit green fluorescence and exploring the possibility of expressing receptors on bacteria.
Our conversation with Prof. Zaiss underscored the significance of setting milestones to demonstrate the viability of our ideas. He highlighted the importance of effectively communicating why our project matters and the value of crafting a compelling presentation. Ultimately, Prof. Zaiss stressed that having a strong, innovative idea is more crucial than achieving a flawless outcome.
A Dry Lab delegation met with Prof. Burkovski at Department of Biology to talk about metabolic modelling and how a Dry Lab approach could aid our project most.
procaryotes are much more flexible when it comes to adapting their biochemical composition to environmental changes. By switching between sigmulons bacteria can quickly shift their protein production to a completely different mode of action. On the one hand, this makes it difficult to predict how E.coli will act in certain situations since a proteomic shift, due to stress factors or different available energy sources, might fundamentally change it's properties. On the other hand this issue makes it difficult to modify the metabolism of E.coli so that for example acetate would not be turned over any more. Prof. Burkovski suggested us to first find a preferably simple operon controlling the SCFA metabolism as a starting point for further plans. Since higher levels of regulation like regulons or modulons possess usually a lot of cross effects in bacteria, it would be easiest to just work with operons to achive our goal.
As a general advice for us as a Dry Lab team, Prof. Burkovski recommended us to develop a back-up plan for our current wet lab approach. We could also calculate and research options for effectively storing and testing the transformed bacteria. A central question we should think about was which energy source would be offered to the bacteria while they were exposed to samples of SCFAs.
We want to thank Prof. Burkovski cordially for supplying us with a lot of background information and expertise about E.coli. His recommendations were vital for our later Dry Lab projects.
A part of our Dry Lab team met with Prof. Uwe Sonnewald at the Chair of Biochemistry of the FAU. We presented our plan on using a metabolic model of the endogenous acetate pathway in E.coli to simulate it’s interaction with our biosensor construct. We asked for Prof. Sonnewalds opinion on our idea and also the project in general.
In summary, we discussed the following points:
The main obstacle we are facing will probably be the sensitivity of our sensor system. If a lot of acetate turn-over takes place inside the cells, it will be difficult to detect the signal derived from the acetate in the medical sample. Therefore, we should aim to establish conditions which induce as little acetate catabolism as possible. This could for example be achieved by supplying E.coli with an appropriate carbon source. The best option would be to suppress the operons catabolising acetate while keeping the membrane transporters for acetate active.
To make calibration easier, Prof. Sonnewald suggested to express a second reporter constitutively in all our transformed cells. If the signal from this reporter changes after adding the bacteria to the sample of faeces, we could conclude that the cell count or over all expression rates changed due to the altered conditions. If this influence cannot be eliminated, at least the second reporter supports mathematical normalization of the desired signal indicating the SCFAs.
While taking measurements with a FACS device, an 2nd reporter will not be obligatory. But for the final detection kit it might provide independence from access to FACS.
A problem with metabolic modelling will be the rapid adaption of procaryotic enzyme concentrations to changing environment conditions. It cannot be assumed, that kinetic parameters of intracellular reactions remain constant over extended periods of time, especially during the change of outside conditions. The same issue applies to intracellular metabolite concentrations under the conditions we are going to work with. To tackle this, Prof. Sonnewald offered us to analyse E.coli cell extracts in the mass spectrometer of his chair.
This could already be done before the transformation of our bacteria is complete, just to get the right metabolic data for our model. After successful transformation, this friendly offer can also be very useful for calibrating our system.
We cordially thank Prof. Sonnewald for sharing his knowledge with us and for offering his support in form of mass spectrometry measurements.
To broaden our knowledge about the role of SCFAs in the body, our integrated human practice team conducted an expert interview with our supervisor Prof. Dr. Mario Zaiss.
Prof. Dr. Zaiss works at the Institute for Clinical Immunology at the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, where he researches the effect of the microbiome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and how these new insights can be used to treat rheumatoid arthritis patients.
First, Prof. Dr. Zaiss told us more about the microbiome in relation to rheumatoid arthritis: patients affected by the disease have been observed to have microbial dysbiosis, a reduction in the diversity of beneficial gut bacteria. Additionally, others who are at high risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis were also seen to have this disruption in the microbiome. This supports the idea that microbial dysbiosis is an environmental trigger for RA.
Moreover, we learned about the impact diet has on the natural balance (homeostasis) of the bacteria within the intestines. One important element of the diet is fibre, which can be soluble or insoluble. Insoluble fibre aids the movement of solids through the intestines, whereas soluble fibre is absorbed by certain gut bacteria and fermented to produce metabolites. Among the most abundant metabolites are short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) which serve as a source of fuel for intestinal epithelial cells and other bacteria types, consequently regulating the processes within the gut.
Besides that, we were also able to discuss a part of Prof. Dr. Zaiss’ research, that focuses on the impact of a high fibre diet on RA patients, with him. For this purpose, different immune parameters present in blood and stool samples of rheumatoid arthritis patients were monitored after the introduction of a high fibre diet. It became evident, that an increase of fibre in the diet, led to an increase of circulating regulatory T cells, which work to suppress the immune system to prevent autoimmunity and over-inflammation. Excitingly, a decrease in markers of bone erosion in affected joints, could also be observed. Therefore, it would be a possibility to supplement or complement existing pharmacological treatment approaches for RA. In addition to their anti-inflammatory properties, it was also found that SCFAs promote regulatory T cells to carry out their function and some evidence suggests that they regulate other inflammatory immune molecules like chemokines.
After learning so much about SCFAs, the microbiome and Prof. Dr. Zaiss’ research, we wanted to know more about other potential roles SCFAs play in the body. Here, we learned that alcohol consumption can protect the body from autoimmune diseases like RA. This could be explained by Prof. Dr. Zaiss and his colleagues, who found out that alcohol metabolizes into acetate in the body. Acetate alters the functionality of T helper cells which aids to regulate the immune system and prevent inflammation. This effect of acetate on the T helper cells means that the production of autoantibodies (antibodies aimed against the host’s body) is inhibited. Consequently, the autoimmune impacts of rheumatoid arthritis are reduced.
Lastly, Prof. Dr. Zaiss introduced us to the mechanisms of gut microbial dysbiosis that cause rheumatoid arthritis. We learned that a peptide called zonulin is found in unusually high quantities in autoimmune humans and mice. Zonulin has a vital part in regulating the tight junctions between cells that prevent water and its solutes from leaking where they shouldn’t. When too much zonulin is present in gut cells, the intestinal barrier becomes leaky and dysbiosis and inflammation occur. Therefore, high blood levels of zonulin can be used to predict the onset of clinical arthritis from asymptomatic autoimmunity. Additionally, it was found that certain compounds such as the SCFA butyrate can prevent RA, by restoring the intestinal barrier before arthritis can take hold. In addition, larazotide acetate, which works to prevent the action of zonulin, increases the integrity of the intestinal barrier to reduce the onset of arthritis. These insights could be used in the future to develop drugs that minimise intestinal barrier damage in order to stop clinical rheumatoid arthritis from forming.
All in all we thank Prof. Dr. Mario Zaiss for this great interview opportunity. Our interview further showed us the important role SCFAs and the microbiome play in the body.
[1] Song M, Chan AT, Sun J. Influence of the Gut Microbiome, Diet, and Environment on Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):322-340. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.048. Epub 2019 Oct 3. PMID: 31586566; PMCID: PMC6957737.
[2] Dong C, Chan SSM, Jantchou P, Racine A, Oldenburg B, Weiderpass E, Heath AK, Tong TYN, Tjønneland A, Kyrø C, Bueno de Mesquita B, Kaaks R, Katzke VA, Bergman MM, Boeing H, Palli D, Masala G, Tumino R, Sacerdote C, Colorado-Yohar SM, Sánchez MJ, Grip O, Lindgren S, Luben R, Huybrechts I, Gunter MJ, Mahamat-Saleh Y, Boutron-Ruault MC, Carbonnel F. Meat Intake Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Ulcerative Colitis in a Large European Prospective Cohort Studyø. J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Aug 30;16(8):1187-1196. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac054 . PMID: 35396592; PMCID: PMC10020974.
[3] Sampson, H. A. (2016). Food allergy: Past, present and future. Allergology International, 65(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2016.08.006
[4] Logan, K., Du Toit, G., Giovannini, M., Turcanu, V., & Lack, G. (2020). Pediatric Allergic Diseases, Food Allergy, and Oral Tolerance. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 36(1), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125346
[5] Fishbein SRS, Mahmud B, Dantas G. Antibiotic perturbations to the gut microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00933-y. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37491458.
[6] Cena H, Calder PC. Defining a Healthy Diet: Evidence for The Role of Contemporary Dietary Patterns in Health and Disease. Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):334. doi:10.3390/nu12020334 . PMID: 32012681; PMCID: PMC7071223.
[7] Firth J, Gangwisch JE, Borisini A, Wootton RE, Mayer EA. Food and mood: how do diet and nutrition affect mental wellbeing? BMJ. 2020 Jun 29;369:m2382. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2382. Erratum in: BMJ. 2020 Nov 9;371:m4269. PMID: 32601102; PMCID: PMC7322666.
[8] Wang R, Li Z, Liu S, Zhang D. Global, regional, and national burden of 10 digestive diseases in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 28;11:1061453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1061453. PMID: 37056655; PMCID: PMC10088561.
[9] Lee CR, Lee JH, Kang LW, Jeong BC, Lee SH. Educational effectiveness, target, and content for prudent antibiotic use. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:214021. doi:10.1155/2015/214021 . Epub 2015 Apr 5. PMID: 25945327; PMCID: PMC4402196.