Troubleshooting
As new researchers in the field of synthetic biology, we understand that the engineering of groundbreaking biological systems is not an easy and smooth process, but it demands a deep understanding of the lab's complexity and a structured approach to problem-solving. Our team wishes to emphasize that troubleshooting is definitely not a sign of failure, in contrast, it demonstrates the tenacity and resilience that characterize scientific exploration and improvement.Below, we share our troubleshooting experiences and insights. We hope these resources will be valuable for future iGEM teams as they conduct their own experiments, tackle their problems, and overcome their obstacles.
First attempt
When we were in the stage of assembly, we had trouble with the recombination of our plasmid with our genes of interest. We have included in our parts the prefix and suffix sequences so that they are compatible with the requirements of BioBrick assembly. On our first attempt, we followed the protocol of New England Bioline (NEB) for the double digestion using restriction enzymes and the protocol of NEB for the ligation using T4 DNA ligase, but both protocols had low success rate. The results of gel electrophoresis showed that the plasmids had not incorporated our parts, so we repeated the assembly with a different protocol.
Modified Assembly Protocol Using Two Restriction Enzymes
The efficiency of Golden Gate Assembly compared to Biobrick was the reason we troubleshooted with a modified protocol. We based it on the Golden Gate Protocol from our instructor Mr. Giannakopoulos, and we replaced BsaI-HFv2 enzyme with the restriction enzymes E.coRI and PstI. The results from gel electrophoresis revealed the success of the protocol and almost all of our parts were inserted into the plasmid vector. We even accomplished a triple assembly since three parts were incorporated into the plasmid vector in one circle.