Establishment of engineered sweet potato is a time-consuming task as the seedling regeneration and the accumulation of starch in the storage roots require a relatively long period of time. The following is a record of the process of our project experiment. For detailed operation procedures and experimental results, please refer to the Protocols and Engineering Success pages.
Embryogenic calli proliferation of sweet potato
Fig. 1 Embryogenic callus culture of sweet potato
Construction of the backbone vector
Fig. 2 Digestion result of psgR-Cas9-At
Fig. 3 E. Coli transformed with backbone vector of sgRNA (IbGBSSI)
Fig. 4 PCR product of sgRNA (IbGBSSI)
Construction of the plant expression vector
Fig.5 Digestion result of psgR-Cas9-sgRNA and pCAMBIA1301s
Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation
Fig. 6 A. tumefaciens transformed with the vector psgR-Cas9-sgRNA(IbGBSSI)-p1301s
Fig. 7 PCR result of A. tumefaciens transformed with psgR-Cas9-sgRNA(IbGBSSI)-p1301s
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation for sweet potato
Fig. 8 Embryogenic callus co-culture with A. tumefaciens transformants (A) and selection of positively transformed callus with hygromycin (B)
GUS detection for regenerated seedlings
Fig. 9 Results of GUS staining
PCR detection for regenerated seedlings
Fig. 10 Detection results of PCRs for gene Hyg and gene Cas9.
Determination of chlorophyll content in leaves
Fig. 11 chlorophyll contents of the transgenic lines
Storage roots harvest
Fig. 12 Phenotypes of the IbGBSSI-knockout lines planted in greenhouse
Determination of the expression level of IbGBSSI in storage roots
Fig. 13 Q-PCR result of the relative expression level of IbGBSSI in root tubers
Starch analysis of transgenic sweet potato storage roots
Qualitative detection of the starch components by iodine staining
Fig. 14 Component detection of total starch by iodine staining
Quantitative detection of the starch composition
Fig. 15 Amylose content (%) of total starch of root tubers