Description
loading
-
-
-
Human Practices


Scroll down for more
Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image Centered Image

Human Practice

1.Issue

Early screening for cancer, cardiovascular disease, infections, and other major illnesses constitutes a critical component of safeguarding human life and well-being. Precise medical diagnosis, grounded in the identification of biomarkers, stands as the most direct, expedient, and effective diagnostic tool, playing a pivotal role in disease detection, progression monitoring, treatment, and assessment of treatment efficacy. In the context of cardiovascular disease, the leading global cause of mortality, the early detection of heart disease biomarkers holds paramount importance in reducing fatalities. Given the covert and sudden nature of heart conditions, there is a growing desire for community hospitals and even households to be equipped for early problem detection. Serum and plasma samples have long been considered the optimal sources of biomarkers due to their ready availability. However, as biomarker levels in blood samples tend to be exceedingly low, there arises a need for the development of highly sensitive and efficient detection techniques and tools. Moreover, for household or portable applications, such tools must be cost-effective and user-friendly. To enable the detection of various diseases, modularity and scalability are essential attributes. The current testing method, ELISA&ECLIA, falls short of meeting these requirements, prompting our decision to address and rectify this situation.

2.Stakeholders’ Map

Following the identification of our project, it is crucial to ascertain the key stakeholders involved. Following extensive deliberations, we have categorized our stakeholders into four distinct groups. For more comprehensive interview data, please refer to our dedicated IHP section. Additionally, we have identified those stakeholders who hold the utmost significance in our endeavors.

loading

Our project's stakeholders have been assessed for their importance using a judgment matrix, and we have calculated the final weights for each group of stakeholders. Our analysis indicates that healthcare, the general public, experts, and manufacturing, in descending order of importance, should guide our decision-making process. While the perspectives of stakeholders in each category are invaluable, prioritizing stakeholders based on their importance will help us make informed choices, especially when faced with conflicting views. This approach allows us to maximize the profits and ensure that our decisions are well-reasoned and balanced.

Healthcare Public Manufacturing Experts Weight
Healthcare 1 2 5 3 0.47
Public 1/2 1 5 2 0.30
Manufacturing 1/5 1/5 1 1/3 0.07
Experts 1/3 1/2 3 1 0.17

Based on our Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis, we have determined that healthcare and the general public hold the highest importance as stakeholders in our project. These groups are closely tied to the real societal needs and their opinions directly and practically address the fundamental issues of our project. Furthermore, these perspectives align with the core interests of the general populace, and as such, their input will be prioritized.Expert opinions primarily serve as constructive guidance for our project. We engage in comprehensive communication with experts to ensure the theoretical soundness and efficiency of our endeavors. However, in cases where the views of healthcare and the public diverge from those of the experts, we will accord precedence to the healthcare and public perspectives to ensure accountability to society and address practical needs effectively.The viewpoints of the manufacturing sector are of significant importance to our hardware design and eventual industrialization. We engage in extensive dialogue with hardware enterprises and experts to enhance our design. While industrialization holds long-term significance, we currently do not prioritize it as our primary focus.

3.Efficient Team Collaboration

We have gained some experience in terms of how to closely connect each team, achieve real-time information sharing, and improve project efficiency.

Document Sharing: We have established an exclusive shared literature library for our project using the Tencent Documents, an instant sharing platform. This library allows us to collect, organize, and categorize the documents referenced by each team member. By doing so, we have significantly improved the efficiency of information sharing and collaboration among different groups involved in our project.

Progress Sharing: Utilizing the Tencent document platform, we have established a "Wet Lab Daily" where daily planning, experimental processes, data, problem analysis, and reflective summaries are meticulously recorded, providing a clear and structured framework. This system streamlines subsequent data processing and summarization and facilitates seamless information exchange among wet lab researchers across different shifts.

Resource Sharing: On the Tencent document platform, we have established a resource sharing repository where the precise locations of experimental materials are clearly indicated. This not only saves time in material acquisition and communication handover but also contributes to reducing safety risks and experimental failure rates caused by the inadvertent use of the wrong materials.

Method Sharing: On the Tencent document platform, we have created a standard method repository where detailed steps of standardized procedures with high repeatability during the experiment process are elaborated. This not only helps prevent experimental data errors resulting from the uncertainty of methods used by different personnel in the same experiment but also further reduces the time spent on communicating and handing over experimental procedures, thus effectively advancing the progress of the project.

Information Sharing: Since the start of the project, we have consistently held a weekly team meeting, which involves all project advisors and team members. During the two-and-a-half-hour session, each subgroup presents progress reports and discusses plans for the following week. This practice helps break down communication barriers between different groups and ensures that all project members have a good understanding of the overall project progress, facilitating better project management.

4.Entrepreneurship & implementation

After talking to various stakeholders, we started to think about entrepreneurship. We built a business plan, we used integrated cardiovascular disease testing reagents and POCT testing services as products, analyzed market conditions, built business model, human resource management model and financial planning. As for the implementation part, we analyzed CVD issues, existing problem, medical device registration, target users, user manual and market risks. For more details, please visit our Entrepreneurship and Implementation page.

5.Safety

How to ensure the safety of every part during the project promotion process is the bottom line of project development. Starting from the aspects of laboratory safety, experimental operation safety, experimental strain safety, the development process of social practice,and the privacy protection of disadvantaged groups,the project team ensures the safety of our project with a full sense of responsibility and rigorous attitude to prevent harm to the environment, society, and people.For more details, please visit our Safety page.

6.Collaboration

During the project, we had the opportunity to attend the 10th Conference of the China iGEMer Community (CCiC), and we fostered productive and collaborative relationships with BNU-China, CPU-China, CJUH-JLU-China, Tianjin, LZU-CHINA, BS-United-China, AIS-China, Shanghai-MedX, RDFZ-CHINA, and ZJFH-Nanjing. Through effective communication and cooperation, we not only gained a wealth of information on project promotion, but these activities also motivate us to think critically about the established strategy and to select the best underlying technology and model for our teamwork. For more details, please visit our Communication page.

7.Reflection

Although we have received a lot of support from stakeholders over our extensive contact,some have raised numerous concerns or flaws with our project.We initially thought that the sampling procedure needed to be convenient, and after reading some literature, we planned on using saliva as the test sample.However, after discussing this idea with doctors in community hospitals, we discovered several disadvantages of saliva samples.For instance,the concentration of characteristic molecules could be infected by various sampling methods, and there is a lack of a standard normal range of concentration, hence blood testing was ultimately chosen instead of saliva testing. Please visit our IHP page for more information about the conversion procedure.

Furthermore, when we focused the project on using NT-proBNP for heart failure detection, we made significant efforts in this direction. However, after our discussion with Dr. Wang, we were disheartened to learn that due to heart failure being a condition rather than a distinct disease, the serious consequences it causes are mostly chronic. In addition, heart failure typically does not occur in isolation but is often accompanied by other medical conditions. Early detection of heart failure is not deemed highly necessary. Moreover, the concentration of NT-proBNP (the gold standard for heart failure detection) varies among individuals, making it impossible to establish a universal standard.Therefore, we realized the necessity of developing a "plug-and-play" modular, portable, and sensitive detection tool. Such a tool would facilitate low-cost, rapid, and efficient multi-molecule parallel testing. This approach allows for the comprehensive assessment of a patient's cardiac health, aiming to take full responsibility for the well-being and health of the patients.

8.Index evaluation system

In order to further assess the aspects of the product that stakeholders value throughout the product development, production, sales, and usage processes and determine the order of optimization for our project, we established an evaluation system of indicators using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).At the systemic level, various factors that could potentially influence stakeholders' perceptions of the product were identified as criteria. At the indicator level, specific measurable aspects were defined for each criterion. For indicators within the same level, pairwise comparisons were made using the criteria from the higher level, resulting in the construction of pairwise comparison judgment matrices. Consistency tests were performed to ensure the reliability of these comparisons. Subsequently, indicator weights were determined.Using the weights of all subordinate indicators within the same level and the weights of all criteria from the higher level, weighted calculations were conducted to derive the weights of all indicators at this level concerning their importance in relation to the highest level. Finally, a comprehensive weight was obtained, allowing us to prioritize and rank various requirements related to the project based on their weighted importance.

After extensive communication and interviews with our stakeholders, we have constructed the evaluation system as shown in the following content.

Target Layer System Layer Indicator Layer
Prioritize the Requirements Related to The Project Quality Detection accuracy; Shelf life of reagent kit and test paper; Storage conditions of reagent kit and test paper; Error control; Quality control between different batches; The science of the principle of the project; Specificity of test objects; Detection sensitivity; Accuracy of detection method
Safety Waste disposal during production; Waste disposal during use; Sample handling; Safety in use
Ethics Sampling methods; Feedback format for test results; Protection of privacy data
Respect Personalized needs of cardiovascular disease patients
Public Health Sample contamination; Risk of cross-infection
Innovation Technical innovation; Business model innovation; Product or service innovation; Marketing innovation; Organizational management
Efficiency Production cycle; Detection time; Level of detail in the instructions; Ease of use; variability in data interpretation and understanding among different users
Costs Environmental impact; Stability; Reagent production and packaging; User storage conditions; Transportation conditions; Medical waste disposal

In relation to the various requirements associated with the project, we conduct comprehensive assessments from eight aspects: quality, safety, ethics, respect, public health, innovation, efficiency, and cost. Each system level is further subdivided into various evaluation indicators. We use this as our evaluation system to comprehensively assess the priorities of various indicators that need to be considered, with the aim of scientifically and effectively optimizing our project to the maximum extent possible within the limited time frame.

AHP Hierarchical Analysis Results for System Layer
Items Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Quality 2.337 29.21 8.622 0.089
Safety 1.144 14.294
Ethics 1.256 15.699
Respect 0.31 3.879
Public Health 1.06 13.253
Innovation 0.42 5.249
Efficiency 0.838 10.476
Costs 0.635 7.94
loading

According to the system-level analysis results, it is evident that quality is the most critical factor, accounting for 29.21% of the total weight and should be given the highest priority. Ethics, safety, public health, and efficiency follow in descending order of importance. Respect and innovation, on the other hand, have lower weights, each below 10%. Therefore, in the future development and sales processes, special attention should be paid to the quality of the product to ensure the accuracy and precision of the testing results, providing consumers with reliable outcomes. While ensuring quality, medical ethics should also be considered, appropriate sampling methods chosen, and consumers' privacy data protected. Additionally, there is a need to further enhance product safety and testing efficiency.

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Quality
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Detection Accuracy 0.817 9.08 9.665 0.083
Shelf Life 0.247 2.741
Storage Conditions 0.348 3.872
Error Control 0.848 9.417
Quality Control Between Different Batches 0.787 8.744
The Science of the Principle of the Project 2.015 22.384
Specificity of Detection Target 2.015 22.384
Sensitivity of Detection 0.531 5.895
Accuracy of Detection Methods 1.393 15.483

In terms of quality analysis, we believe that the science of the principle of the project, specificity of the detection target, and accuracy of the detection methods are the top three aspects we should consider. This aligns with the results of our discussions with healthcare professionals. Recognizing this, we have engaged experts and professors in the wet lab, dry lab, and hardware teams for further in-depth discussions on our experimental and hardware designs to ensure that our project's design principles are scientifically sound and that our hardware products can effectively visualize and provide feedback on our test results. We actively communicate with the wet lab team to track the accuracy and precision data of our technology and strive to improve the existing solution through literature research and expert interviews. In addition to the above three points, error control during the detection process and product quality control are also areas of priority. Storage conditions and shelf life, while important as industrial indicators, are worth considering during the technical development stage but may not be the top priority.

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Safety
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Production Waste Handling 2.172 54.304 4.198 0.066
Utilization of Waste Materials 0.306 7.647
Sample Handling 0.544 13.599
Safety during Use 0.978 24.451

On the safety front, the handling of production waste is of paramount importance to us. As a synthetic biology technology product, we strive to control the potential for bacterial leakage or environmental contamination during the production process and in the handling of waste materials. We actively communicate with the wet lab team and expert professors to establish preventive measures and ensure the personal safety of production personnel. For details, please refer to our safety page.Safety during use, sample handling, and the handling of waste materials are also areas of great concern for us. In our hardware design, we are committed to ensuring the safety of consumers during use and safe sample handling, demonstrating a sense of responsibility towards users, the environment, and society as a whole. Regarding the utilization of waste materials, in order to prevent issues such as cross-contamination and environmental pollution, we will design distinctive, brightly colored medical waste disposal bags. These bags will be included with the test kits and can also be sold separately as a mature product or distributed for community welfare purposes. They can serve as a means to collect not only the test kits but also potentially infectious medical waste generated in users' daily lives, such as masks and medical cotton swabs. Ultimately, these waste disposal bags can be collected as part of waste sorting and disposal, fulfilling our commitment to user, societal, and environmental responsibility.

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Ethics
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Sampling Methods 0.42 13.993 3.136 0.068
Result Feedback Format 0.859 28.645
Data Privacy Protection 1.721 57.363

Data privacy protection is our top ethical concern. We have designed optional data analysis features, allowing users to choose whether to upload and further analyze their data. In addition, we have had extensive discussions with the hardware team to ensure that all data within our data analysis app is securely protected to prevent any personal information leakage. For more details, please visit our hardware page. Result feedback format and sampling methods are also aspects we need to consider. Recognizing that many users may not have a background in biology, may have biases in data interpretation, or may have individual differences in psychological tolerance, we are striving to find a result feedback format that is intuitive, objective, accurate, and less prone to ambiguity as the final presentation format in our app."

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Public Health
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Sample Contamination 0.859 28.645 3.136 0.068
Risk of Cross-infection 1.721 57.363
Economic Costs 0.42 13.993

The issue of post-sample use handling was resolved after our discussions with community hospitals and reagent kit manufacturers. We decided to design appropriate collection bags to protect others from potential hazards. This is also reflected in our safety level analysis. For more details, please refer to our IHP page.

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Innovation
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Technical Innovation 1.333 26.655 5.355 0.089
Business Model Innovation 0.817 16.345
Product or Service Innovation 2.047 40.935
Marketing Innovation 0.537 10.735
Organizational management innovation 0.267 5.331

In terms of innovation, product or service innovation should be our top priority, which is fully confirmed by our previous communication with all stakeholders. Products and services face users directly, and their quality is closely related to users, environment and society. Technical innovation is also a point worth considering. The current mature detection technology is limited, and it is urgent to develop new technologies with more advantages. Business model innovation, marketing innovation, and organizational management innovation are important in the long run, but for time reasons, we don't prioritize them.

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Efficiency
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Production Cycle 0.248 4.954 5.488 0.122
Detection Time 0.625 12.494
Instruction Manual Detail Level 1.306 26.111
Usage Method Simplicity 2.02 40.391
Understanding levels of the population 0.802 16.049

In terms of efficiency, we once grappled with the priority between the detail level of the instruction manual and the simplicity of the usage method. After thorough analysis, we determined that the simplicity of the usage method should be the top priority. To achieve this, we communicated with the hardware team to design our hardware usage method, striving to ensure users of various backgrounds can easily grasp it. Of course, the detail level of the instruction manual is still very important. Considering various uncontrollable factors during the actual operation, we have made the manual detailed, elaborating on errors, mishandlings, expiration dates, storage methods, standard usage procedures, unexpected scenarios, waste disposal methods, etc. This is to prevent detection errors or contamination risks due to user variability. For more details, please refer to our Hardware page.

Items AHP Hierarchy Analysis Results for Costs
Feature Vector Weight Value(%) Maximum Eigenvalue CI Value
Environmental Friendliness 0.781 13.021 7.044 0.209
Stability 1.344 22.396
Production and Packaging of Reagents 1.969 32.812
User Storage Conditions 0.344 5.729
Transportation Conditions 0.781 13.021
Medical Waste Disposal 0.781 13.021

In terms of cost, the production and packaging of reagents are aspects we should consider most, including antibody production, strain cultivation, accessory production, and container production. These align with the primary cost aspects we discussed with the reagent kit manufacturers. As we move towards industrialization in the future, we will continue to communicate with reagent kit manufacturers to reduce costs after the technology becoming mature. Stability, transportation conditions, medical waste disposal, and environmental friendliness are also vital considerations. To ensure responsibility to the consumers, the quality of the product, stability, and transportation cost are paramount. To be environmentally responsible, the environmental and sustainability factors of the materials are aspects we need to consider. We should select materials that are stable, cost-effective, and sustainable for production. When these three aspects can't be balanced, stability should be our top priority.

9.Project Boundaries

In the future, we hope to more fully incorporate the guidance and suggestions of Professor Wang, designing multiple chromatographic test paper flow channels. By controlling the gradient of antibody concentration, we intend to achieve more distinct detection lines, facilitating the parallel detection of various molecules. This will enhance the product's comprehensive assessment capability. In the long run, it may be possible that we can achieve personalized customization based on individual circumstances.

Regarding the equipment, considering the varied sizes of phones from different manufacturers and models, we plan to optimize and design adaptive adjustable devices compatible with all phone models. This ensures the uniformity of the visual feedback results. Moving forward, we hope to design a more intricate structure that moves beyond the limitations of simple lasers, using LEDs as an alternative.

For the feedback result analysis software, we anticipate integrating it with AI in the future. Respecting individual differences and based on detection results, the system could provide more personalized and direct guidance. This would eliminate potential inefficiencies that might arise from varying levels of understanding of the feedback results.

10.Positive and Negative Effects of the Project

Our project team aims to develop a biomarker detection tool that can be conveniently used in community hospitals and homes. Due to its "plug and play" nature, it enables low-cost, efficient, and precise detection across various scenarios. Moreover, as it employs a non-pathogenic strain of E. coli as the chassis cell and operates outside a cellular system, the product is non-infectious. This ensures maximum biosafety for users. As a portable detection tool, it can significantly assist individuals in impoverished areas or places with limited medical resources in their daily health monitoring, promoting equal distribution of medical resources and enhancing overall well-being.

To ensure our project is grounded in reality and socially responsible, we embarked on several community engagement activities. Throughout these engagements, we continuously refined and adapted our project to be more aligned with real-world needs, opting for alternatives to replace potentially harmful or imperfect components. In the process, we also established a comprehensive communication and management strategy. We employed the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for scientific analysis to assess various factors in our production chain, aiming to maximize stakeholder satisfaction within the given timeframe. We hope our approach serves as a valuable reference for subsequent teams.

Our project utilizes the self-assembled Mi3 protein cage as the modular chassis molecule, which was modified with fluorescent proteins. Due to its stable structure, multiple surface sites, strong expandability, and the ability to self-assemble within cells, it offers ample application potentials in the detection field. Moreover, the protein cage is a reliable and effective tool in enzyme immobilization, molecular delivery, and other areas. We firmly believe our project can expand research in this domain, offering inspiration and assistance to other research teams.

As our test kit uses blood samples for detection, it will come equipped with disposable blood collection needles and other one-time-use blood collection and processing accessories. We cannot be certain that users won't suffer from puncture wounds or infections due to mishandling or packaging breach. This places strict demands on our instruction manual and the quality assurance of the kit components. Moving forward, we will continuously monitor and maintain a responsible attitude to rigorously address potential hazards.

Integrated Human Practice

Summary

As a project team closely linked to human health and well-being, the actual needs and ideas of stakeholders are crucial to us. Our ultimate goal is to use the protein cage as a vehicle to develop a practical and responsible portable detection tool for disease biomarkers that benefits the world. This requires us to fully understand the values and needs of stakeholders to assess whether our project addresses the real issues effectively. At the same time, we also need to listen to diverse opinions through continuous discussions with stakeholders, considering the positive and negative effects of our proposed solutions from environmental, social, ethical, safety, and various perspectives.

During the project implementation, we did our best to prioritize the information obtained from our research based on scientific evaluations and make reasonable adjustments at different stages of wet lab, dry lab, and other segments. Please read the information below to understand how our work influences the shaping of our project.

Close the Loop

Based on the inspiration for our project, we began to construct a human practice framework to seek a more comprehensive understanding of the societal needs and priorities for health screening and assessment, ensuring every step can be practical. Through a collective brainstorming session, we chose "Long-COVID" cardiac complications as our focus. This is because a study presented at the 2023 American College of Cardiology (ACC) annual meeting and the World Congress of Cardiology (WCC) showed that symptoms can persist for months after contracting the coronavirus, termed as "Long-COVID", which doubles the risk of cardiovascular diseases.Given the stealthy and sudden nature of heart diseases, early identification of cardiac biomarkers is crucial for reducing mortality rates. There is an increasing demand for early screenings in community hospitals and even at home. As a result, we created a mind map as shown below, starting from exploring actual needs, theoretical design optimization, and real-world application improvements. We considered the values and needs of stakeholders and created a feedback loop.

loading

Click image for more

First, we adopted a problem-oriented approach, conducting thorough research on the actual occurrences of cardiovascular diseases from three perspectives: patients, community hospitals, and doctors. This allowed us to gather firsthand information and collect both needs and issues. Subsequently, we integrated the needs and problems we collected into our project using a value-sensitive analysis method. With value as our driving force, we proceeded with theoretical design and optimization. We sought opinions and suggestions from scholars in synthetic biology, analytical chemistry, optical instrument and other fields to enhance our solution, refining the scientific and feasibility aspects of our project approach, and defining the scope of our project.

Following this, we reached out to diagnostic kit manufacturing companies to understand whether our solution aligns with market demands and to identify challenges and considerations in the commercialization process. Lastly, using the real needs as our feedback benchmark, we critically reflected upon our solutions to see if them effectively addressed the real-world problems, fully grasping both the positive and negative impacts of our project. We continuously refined and optimized our project to complete a full cycle of development and feedback.

In the following sections, we will present a timeline showcasing the various stakeholders we interviewed and our reflections based on these interactions.

Timeline of Project Improvement
loading
loading
loading
loading
loading
loading