Overview
Both norovirus and rotavirus are pathogens that cause diarrhea in infants and
young children
1
.
Vaccination is the primary means of preventing and controlling rotavirus and
norovirus infections
2
. Rotavirus vaccines have been clinically used for many years and can
significantly alleviate symptoms caused by rotavirus infections
3
. Due to the difficulty in achieving in vitro isolation and cultivation of
norovirus, there is currently no norovirus vaccine available for use. This study is mainly based on genetic
engineering vaccines. We mainly used genetic engineering methods to construct corresponding plasmids to
develop specific vaccines against norovirus
and
rotavirus
viruses
.
Results of Experiments
We will introduce the results of our project from the following
four
aspects
:
(1)
Construction of recombinant plasmids
(2)
Protein expression and purification
(3)
Expression optimization
(4)
Verification of protein expression in
E. coli
Nissle 1917
1. Construction of recombinant plasmids
To
construct three recombinant
plasmids
,
i.e.
,
pGEX-GII.4-VP1
,
pGEX-GII.17-VP1,
and
pGEX-
RV-
GII.17-VP1,
firstly, we amplified the
GII.4-VP1 (
1620 bp
)
,
GII.17-VP1 (
1620 bp
)
and RV
-
VP7
(
843 bp
)
fragments by PCR. As shown in
F
igure 1A, the three genes were amplified successfully compared to
the
15K maker.
T
hrough the double enzyme digestion experiment, we successfully obtained
the linearized
plasmid pGEX-4T-1
(
Figure 1B
)
, which
was then ligated with GII.4-VP1
,
GII.17-VP1
and RV
-
VP7 fragments
, respectively. The mappings of recombinant plasmids after ligation are shown
in Figure 1C-D.
Figure 1 Construction of three
plasmids
Subsequently
the plasmids pGEX-GII.4-VP1 and pGEX-GII.17-VP1 were
transformed
into
E. coli
BL21 (DE3) competent cells,
respectively. The plasmid pGEX-
RV-
GII.17-VP1 was
transformed
into
E. coli
BL21 (DE3) and
E. coli
Nissle 1917
, respectively. After overnight incubation, transformants were successfully
grown on LB plates (
Figure 2
A-B). We performed colony PCR identification of the transformants, and the
results are shown in the figure, about 2/3 of the transformants containing pGEX-GII.17-VP1 had the correct
bands; all of the transformants containing pGEX-GII.4-VP1 or pGEX-RV-GII.17-VP1 had the correct bands (
Figure 2
C-D). To further verify the construction of the plasmid, we sequenced the
positive transformants, and the sequencing results showed that the expression frame sequences were all
correct, indicating that the plasmids were successfully constructed (
Figure 2
E-G).
Figure 2 Results of plasmid transformation, identification
,
and sequencing
2. Protein expression and purification
We inoculated positive transformants and induced protein expression by IPTG.
After obtaining protein lysates, we purified the target proteins using GST tags and verified the protein
expression and purification results by SDS-PAGE. The results are shown in Figure 3, we successfully
expressed GII.4-VP1 protein, but the purified protein was barely visible, which might be due to the low
expression of protein. In the future, we plan to increase the expression level of the GII.4-VP1 protein. As
shown in Figure 4, we successfully expressed and purified GII.17-VP1 protein (
60
kDa).
Figure 3
SDS-PAGE results of pGEX-GII.4-VP1
protein expression and purification
(P represents
" Precipitation" ,
S represents
" Supernatant" ,
T represents
" Flow through" ,
W represents
" Wash solution" and
E represents
" Eluent
"
)
Figure 4
SDS-PAGE results of pGEX-GII.
17
-VP1
protein expression and purification
(P represents
" Precipitation" ,
S represents
" Supernatant" ,
T represents
" Flow through" ,
W represents
" Wash solution" , and
E represents
" Eluent
"
)
3.
Expression optimization
In addition to constructing norovirus-associated plasmids, we constructed
recombinant plasmids incorporating norovirus and rotavirus antigenic genes. Similarly, we inoculated the
transformant containing pGEX-RV-GII.17-VP1, induced its expression, and explored its optimal expression
conditions.
To find the optimal conditions for the highest protein expression, we chose
different concentrations (OD
600
=0.3/0.6/0.8/1) of the bacterial solution and different IPTG induction times
(0 h/4 h/8 h/16 h). After obtaining each protein lysate, we measured the total protein amount (A280) under
different induction conditions (
Figure
6A
). In addition, we examined the expression of the target proteins using
SDS-PAGE (
Figure
5
) and used the ImageJ software to quantify the target band
(119 KDa) on the SDS-PAGE gel,
collected and organized the data, and plotted a line graph with OD
600
as the x-axis and gray value
as the y-axis (Figure 6B).
As shown in Figure 6, the protein concentration roughly tended to increase
with increasing bacterial concentration at the same IPTG induction time. When the bacterial concentration
was 0.8 and the induction time was 8 hours, the best protein expression level was achieved, indicating that
this condition was more suitable for expressing more target proteins.
Figure 5
SDS-PAGE results of
RV-
GII.
17
-VP1
protein under different expression
conditions
Figure 6 Effect of IPTG induction time and bacterial concentration on protein
concentration
4.
Verification of protein expression in
E. coli Nissle 1917
E. coli
Nissle 1917 (EcN) is a Gram-negative probiotic and an ideal expression vector
for oral live vaccines
4
. So we
transformed
plasmid
pGEX-
RV-
GII.17-VP1
into
E. coli
Nissle 1917. Through the SDS-PAGE gel map, it was found that we have weak
bands within the
119
kD
a
range, which means that RV-
GII.17-VP1
protein expression level is
weak in
E. coli
Nissle 1917
(Figure 7)
.
This initially confirmed that
RV-GII.17-VP1 could be successfully expressed in Nissle 1917, but the expression conditions need to be
optimized.
Figure 7
SDS-PAGE results of pGEX-
RV-
GII.
17
-VP1
protein expression in
E.coli
Nissle 1917
(P represents
" Precipitation" ,
S represents
" Supernatant" ,
T represents
" Flow through" ,
W represents
" Wash solution" and
E represents
" Eluent
"
)
Future plan
At present, we have determined the optimal conditions for protein expression
in
E
.
coli
. Next, we will improve and optimize the protein expression method to achieve
large-scale expression of
RV-
GII.
17
-VP1 in
E. coli
Nissle 1917
. In addition, the next
stage
of our project will be to obtain transformed
E. coli
Nissle 1917
through tube feeding in mice,
and then measure the levels of anti-RV-GII.17-VP1 IgG in mouse serum and IgA in feces. Finally, we can
verify the immunogenicity of our oral vaccine.
References:
1.
Hallowell, B. D., Parashar, U. D., & Hall, A. J. (2019). Epidemiologic
challenges in norovirus vaccine development. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 15(6),
1279-C1283.
2.
Esposito S, Principi N.
Norovirus Vaccine: Priorities for Future Research and Development.
Front Immunol. 2020 Jul 7;11:1383.
3.
Offit Paul A. Challenges to Developing a Rotavirus Vaccine.[J]. Viral
immunology,2018,31(2).
4.
Jacobi, C. A., & Malfertheiner, P. (2011). Escherichia coli Nissle 1917
(Mutaflor): new insights into an old probiotic bacterium. Digestive diseases (Basel,
Switzerland), 29(6), 600-C607.