Executive summary
Existing methods for microplastic detection often rely on visual classification and additional instruments, which are not suitable for nanoplastic detection, leading to potential miscalculations. Combining various techniques has shown promise but has also introduced comparability issues due to methodological differences. LuciPep combines molecular biology, bioluminescence and smartphone technology to address the challenges of microplastic detection. Its usefulness could spread beyond environmental research and monitoring and into the field of human health. Our innovative molecular method for direct microplastic quantification in raw, unpurified samples has the potential to extend to nanoplastic detection. Thus, LuciPep offers solutions to current shortcomings in microplastic diagnostics while adding significant value to the market.
LuciPep simplifies field sampling, minimizes sample treatment and provides more reliable estimates of particle concentration. Additionally, LuciPep aims to make this technology accessible to smaller laboratories worldwide, including those with limited resources, by utilizing smartphones for detection. This opens up various use-case scenarios, from environmental research institutes to water resource management agencies. Collaborations with research institutions, environmental organizations, biotech companies, government agencies and analytical laboratories will play a crucial role in refining and validating LuciPep's technology, ultimately contributing to the global understanding of microplastic pollution and its management.
LuciPep leverages molecular elements, including microplastic binding peptides (MBPs) for high-specificity detection and NanoLuc luciferase for bioluminescent biosensing coupled with smartphone-based data analysis. MBPs unique sensitivity to nanoplastics, smaller sample requirements and adaptability set LuciPep apart. It not only fills a critical gap in microplastic monitoring but also opens doors to applications in health research, specifically microplastic detection in blood samples. LuciPep's potential strengths include user-friendliness, adaptability and inclusivity, while external opportunities lie in the growing global awareness of microplastic pollution. Potential collaborations with governmental and environmental agencies, research institutions and water management authorities will further its reach and credibility. However, challenges include ensuring accuracy, staying ahead of competitors and adapting to evolving biotechnology. Effective risk management through quality control, innovation, adaptability and regulatory diligence will be essential for LuciPep's success in both environmental and health research applications.
Microplastics necessitate innovative detection methods and LuciPep emerges as a potential game-changer. Traditional techniques like microscopy lack sensitivity and spectroscopy, while effective, is costly and expertise-dependent. LuciPep's smartphone-based system offers user-friendly, cost-effective and accurate microplastic detection, making it highly accessible for both rural and urban areas. Its implementation could revolutionize waste management, enabling real-time monitoring, crowdsourced databases and substantial cost reductions by eliminating the need for specialized equipment. Moreover, LuciPep's adaptability extends its utility to studying microplastic bioaccumulation in humans, addressing health concerns. Despite potential limitations related to plastic compatibility, calibration, data handling and standardization, LuciPep's accessibility and versatility position it as a promising solution for mitigating plastic pollution and understanding its impact on ecosystems and human health.
Long-term impact
Microplastics are prevalent pollutants affecting ecosystems. Plastics break down into micro- and nano-sized particles through natural degradation processes like UV radiation or commercial processes like thermal degradation. Plastics are some of the most ubiquitous materials in human applications because of their versatility, cost-effectiveness, durability, biocompatibility, customization flexibility, chemical resistance and ease of production. Nevertheless, their disproportionate use has also made them ubiquitous in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (Yee et al., 2021).
The LuciPep detection system could be a revolutionary technology in the field of microplastic detection. Conventional detection techniques involving the use of microscopy lack the necessary accuracy and sensitivity to detect minute plastic particles. Spectroscopy, although convenient for testing smaller microplastic particles, is a generally expensive alternative that also requires expertise. This hinders its use as a routine solution. LuciPep’s ease of detection and simplified smartphone application set it apart from conventional methods. Smartphones have advanced cameras and sensors that could detect sensitive signals with good accuracy. Moreover, these devices are continuously improving, which is all the more promising for our product.
The implementation of LuciPep in both rural and urbanized landscape could have a significant impact on the waste management sector. Its accessibility would enable small laboratories and institutions to carry out microplastic detection anywhere with an affordable kit and a smartphone. This would facilitate real-time monitoring of plastic pollution and the creation of crowdsourced or user-generated content databases, providing up-to-date information for researchers and policymakers. By facilitating access to this technology across the world, we could identify major pollution hotspots and emerging environmental threats worldwide, which would be helpful in devising timely mitigation strategies. Economically, the use of such a simplified detection method would eliminate the use of specialized laboratory equipment and elaborate infrastructure, reducing costs.
However, while the focus so far has been on microplastics as ecosystem disruptors, these particles have also been found to accumulate in different organisms, including humans (Çobanoğlu, 2021). For humans, the main exposure is through ingestion of contaminated food, inhalation of airborne particles and, to a lesser extent, direct skin contact. In fact, microplastics have been detected in human stool samples. The implications of this have raised the concern even further. LuciPep would be compatible with microplastic screening in human samples. Thus, it would facilitate research on microplastic bioaccumulation and, in the long-term, its impact on human health.
As simplified and accessible as this technology is, we consider its potential limitations. The sensor’s compatibility to certain plastics could limit its effectiveness and narrow its applicability, while technical issues related to luminescence calibration, data handling of users and data accuracy and reliability would have to be assessed and optimized. In the end, the success of this application will partly depend on solving these issues and ensuring broad data sharing and user management, requiring extensive outreach and spreading awareness too. Effective standardization and scalability also play a key role in the promotion and implementation of this application.
References
Bauten, W., Nöth, M., Kurkina, T., Contreras, F., Ji, Y., Desmet, C., ... & Schwaneberg, U. (2023). Plastibodies for multiplexed detection and sorting of microplastic particles in high-throughput. Science of The Total Environment, 860, 160450.
Çobanoğlu, H., Belivermiş, M., Sıkdokur, E., Kılıç, Ö. & Çayır, A. (2021). Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of polyethylene microplastics on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Chemosphere, 272, 129805.
Li, J., Liu, H. & Chen, J.P. (2018). Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water research, 137, 362-374.
Lv, L., Yan, X., Feng, L., Jiang, S., Lu, Z., Xie, H., Sun, S., Chen, J. & Li, C. (2021). Challenge for the detection of microplastics in the environment. Water Environment Research, 93(1), 5-15.
Oh, S., Hur, H., Kim, Y., Shin, S., Woo, H., Choi, J., & Lee, H. H. (2021). Peptide specific nanoplastic detection based on sandwich typed localized surface plasmon resonance. Nanomaterials, 11(11), 2887.
Prata, J. C., da Costa, J. P., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2019). Methods for sampling and detection of microplastics in water and sediment: a critical review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 110, 150-159.
Setälä, O., Granberg, M., Hassellöv, M., Karlsson, T., Lehtiniemi, M., Mattsson, K., Strand, K., Talvitie, J. & Magnusson, K. (2019). Monitoring of microplastics in the marine environment: Changing directions towards quality controlled tailored solutions. Nordic Council of Ministers.
UNEP. (2021). From Pollution to Solution.
Woo, H., Kang, S. H., Kwon, Y., Choi, Y., Kim, J., Ha, D. H., ... & Choi, J. (2022). Sensitive and specific capture of polystyrene and polypropylene microplastics using engineered peptide biosensors. RSC advances, 12(13), 7680-7688.
Yao, Z., Zhang, B. S., & Prescher, J. A. (2018). Advances in bioluminescence imaging: new probes from old recipes. Current opinion in chemical biology, 45, 148-156.
Yee, M., Hii, L., Looi, C.K., Lim, W., Wong, S., Kok, Y., Tan, B., Wong, C. & Leong, C. (2021) Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Human Health. Nanomaterials, 11(2), 496.