Project Description

Introduction

In the 1950s, humans started using a harmful group of chemicals called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

PFOA1

It has been used in products like non-stick pans, raincoats, and fire-fighting foam because of their water- and oil-repellant properties, and their chemical stability1. Because of their longevity, they travel from waste products into the environment and eventually seep into the ground and accumulate in humans and animals.

At vitroFAS, we aim to improve the health of humans and the planet by degrading PFAS. We do this by enhancing PFAS degrading enzymes for waterworks to implement in their filtration of drinking and wastewater.

Our First Contact with PFAS

water-tap

Back in 2021, major Danish news outlets published stories about PFAS contamination on firefighting training grounds2. This was the first time our teams members heard about PFAS. These stories directed us toward the topic of PFAS.

After discussing the issue with professionals in the field of clean water we grew to understand that the PFAS problem caused a major inconvenience to Danish Water treatment facilities around the country. The chemicals have now infiltrated the groundwater, the source of Denmark’s drinking water. This is unfortunately not only an issue in Denmark it is a worldwide problem3.

The Destructive Effects of PFAS

pathway-image
Fig 1: An example of how products containing PFAS can lead to PFAS contaminating the environment and accumulating in humans and wildlife.

Health issues such as a weakened immune system, endometriosis, various disruptions of liver function, reduced fertility, and increased risk of certain cancers are just some of the complications PFAS are complicit in4,5.

PFAS do not only impact humans; it also finds its way into the ocean, affecting underwater ecosystems, and seeps into the soil, where it can harm farm animals and wildlife. Studies have shown that PFAS are harmful to humans. Their ecological effects remain widely unknown, even though PFAS contamination has been documented in more than 330 animal species – from polar bears to dolphins and even pandas6.


All of these consequences call for action.

A Global Concern

The European Union has been working on determining various regulations concerning PFAS, like the Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulations. In 2001 the Stockholm Convention was signed by 182 countries. Here they opted to protect human health and the environment from POPs. In 2009 the PFAS molecule Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) was added to the list of restricted pollutants and in 2019 Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was added7.

Additionally, there are limits to how high the concentration of PFAS are allowed to be in drinking water. In the European Union, the limit is 0.5 µg/L8 and in Denmark, it is set to 0.002 µg/L9. Waterworks finding concentrations above this limit must shut down or dilute the contaminated water.

waterworks-img

These restrictions are a step in the right direction, though years of PFAS production has already caused damage. Therefore, to fix the current contamination, we focused on cleaning our drinking- and wastewater to protect citizens and wildlife from consuming the harmful ‘forever chemicals’.

To get the most out of our efforts, we turn our focus to one of the most widespread types of PFAS: Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Together with Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), it is the most produced and widespread PFAS molecule. PFOA is a long-chained substance. The long chain increases the bioaccumulation in humans and wildlife10. PFOA specifically is, besides the health risks listed above, linked to reduced fertility, complications during pregnancy, increased risk of testicular cancer, and more11. Because of these risks, it is of great interest to get rid of PFOA.

The vitroFAS Solution

Current efforts in removing PFAS from water bodies include12,13:
Bioremediation is a promising approach to eliminating PFAS from our environment but currently, it is a very slow and time-consuming process. Our team builds upon the discoveries of previous iGEM teams – USAFA20 and USAFA21. The two teams found a set of hydrolytic dehalogenases (DeHa) in Delftia acidovorans, capable of degrading PFOA, by cleaving fluoride from the long carbon chains and by cleaving the trifluoromethyl group (-CF3) of the carbon chain14,15.
molecule-image
Fig 2: PFOA molecule marked with the cleaving sites of the DeHas.

We are optimizing the effectiveness of the enzymes’ ability to cleave fluoride and the trifluoromethyl group (-CF3) from PFOA. We use error-prone PCR to induce random mutations in the gene sequences encoding each DeHa.

To find and select the most efficient enzymes after optimizing, we have constructed a plasmid BBa_K4868001 that carries two major features:

  1. A red fluorescent protein (RFP) expressed under an IPTG-inducible T7 promoter. This RFP gene can be cut out via Golden Gate cloning to be exchanged with a DeHa gene.
  2. A fluoride-responsive riboswitch, that when bound by fluoride induces expression of green fluorescent protein.

To select enzymes with higher catalytic activity, we use a combined approach of Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting (FACS), and 96-well fluorescence plate reader screening. We also characterize the enzymes in vitro with F-NMR and by using a fluoride probe to measure fluoride release from degradation.

In summary, when cultured with PFOA, cells with enzymes of higher activity will be more fluorescent.

insertion-piece-image
Fig 3: Schematic overview of BBa_K4868001. The construct consists of two parts; an insertion site and a fluoride-sensitive riboswitch coupled to GFP expression.

The DeHa mutant plasmids were sequenced to reveal the underlying mutations of the improved enzyme, and the protein was isolated via its His-tag, to determine the enzymatic activity in vitro.

To complement the work performed in the laboratory and to excel the project even further, we performed various computational investigations. These involve predicting the tertiary structure of the DeHas, performing docking simulations with PFOA and thousands of other PFAS molecules, and inducing mutations to investigate the effects of these on the DeHas ability to bind PFOA.

Implementation Into the Real World

We have researched the implementation of our purified enzymes: vitroZymes.

The vitroZymes will be used to degrade PFAS in highly concentrated PFAS water. This synthetic biology solution is an alternative to the current unsustainable process of incineration.
implementation-image
Fig 4: A showcase of the future implementation of our product. vitroZymes will be coupled to cleanse drinking water and wastewater.

Recently a waterwork in Denmark started using an ion exchange resin filter to catch PFAS in their water16. This filter has been effective in removing PFAS from drinking water, however, once used, it cannot be reused. The resin filter has a byproduct of highly concentrated PFAS contaminated water. We envision that the integration of our vitroZymes in the water treatment process ensures efficient removal and degradation of PFAS from drinking water and wastewater. As a result, we reduce the pollution of PFAS in the environment.

Conclusion

We have observed that PFAS is a long-term issue, which is impacting human and planet health. We, vitroFAS, are addressing this problem through the application of synthetic biology. Using optimized dehalogenases, we are degrading one of the most prevalent PFAS molecules, PFOA! Consequently, we intend to integrate our vitroZymes into PFAS filtration systems to address this challenge.

Experimental Design

next-page-button

  1. Gaines, L. G. T. (2023). Historical and current usage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A literature review. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 66(5), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23362
  2. Munch-Jensen, M. (2021). Ekspert: Forgiftningen af 180 mennesker i Korsør er kun toppen af isbjerget. Energy Supply. https://www.energy-supply.dk/article/view/798005/ekspert_forgiftningen_af_180_mennesker_i_korsor_er_kun_toppen_af_isbjerget?fbclid=IwAR2vjULQkEW0_RsX_GR-FUvSW4quLjhnfXHUjgKXw75RDB45zcx16mYIE_8
  3. Zuzelo, P. R. (2020). Water Worries: Quick Review of PFAS Contamination as a Health Threat. Holistic Nursing Practice, 34(2), 132-134. https://doi.org/10.1097/hnp.0000000000000368
  4. EPA. (April 10, 2023). PFAS Explained. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained
  5. Fenton, S. E., Ducatman, A., Boobis, A., DeWitt, J. C., Lau, C., Ng, C., Smith, J. S., & Roberts, S. M. (2021). Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 40(3), 606-630.
  6. Wildlife warning: More than 330 species contaminated with ‘forever chemicals’. (February 22, 2023). https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2023/02/wildlife-warning-more-330-species-contaminated-forever-chemicals
  7. UN. (June 2022). The new POPs under the Stockholm Convention. United Nation. https://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/TheNewPOPs/tabid/2511/Default.aspx?fbclid=IwAR3-FoYU9EZw5P15DBds3yRzQnwaTmW-7OXiChU0L2By8vNQ5fbxTrAZG-k
  8. ECHA. “Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).” https://echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/perfluoroalkyl-chemicals-pfas
  9. eurofins. Eurofins Miljø Vand A/S analyserer ned til de nye skærpede kvalitetskriterier for perfluorerede stoffer (PFAS). https://www.eurofins.dk/miljoe/nyheder/nye-graensevaerdier-for-pfas/
  10. Vendl, C., Taylor, M. D., Bräunig, J., Gibson, M. J., Hesselson, D., Neely, G. G., Lagisz, M., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Profiling research on PFAS in wildlife: Protocol of a systematic evidence map and bibliometric analysis. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 2(4), e12106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12106
  11. ATSDR. PFAS - An Overview of the Science and Guidance for Clinicians on Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Agency For Toxic Substances and Disease Registery. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/docs/clinical-guidance-12-20-2019.pdf
  12. Shahsavari, E., Rouch, D., Khudur, L. S., Thomas, D., Aburto-Medina, A., & Ball, A. S. (2021). Challenges and Current Status of the Biological Treatment of PFAS-Contaminated Soils [Review]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.602040
  13. USAFA iGEM 2021, (2021). "USAFA iGEM 2021- Defluorine Machine." https://2021.igem.org/Team:USAFA
  14. USAFA iGEM 2020, (2020). "Detection and Degradation of Perfluoroalkyl Substances through Bioengineering." https://2020.igem.org/Team:USAFA
  15. Silhorko. (2022). PFAS-forurenet drikkevand på Fanø skal renses med innovativt vandbehandlingsanlæg fra SILHORKO. https://www.silhorko.dk/dk/nyheder/pfas-fjernes-paa-fanoe