RoSynth Biotechnologies Business Plan


Executive Summary



Team RoSynth is currently developing an innovative biosynthesis platform to enhance the production of high-demand plant-derived medicines. Our approach is particularly suited for drug manufacturing processes that require extensive labor and are restricted by the availability of plants. Our team is overcoming the limitations of conventional biosynthesis methods by devising a cutting-edge 3D bioprinter. This bioprinter creates hydrogels infused with specially engineered bacteria and yeast co-cultures, which in turn facilitate the more streamlined production of plant compounds, resulting in increased product yield.

To demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, we are synthesizing rosmarinic acid—a small molecule esteemed for its extensive therapeutic and culinary applications. Our ultimate aim is to extend our initiative to the synthesis of other indispensable plant-derived compounds. We are committed to an ethical and efficient synthetic biology strategy that promises to revolutionize the field.

In our project, we utilize hydrogels infused with 3D-printed cultures of E. coli and S. cerevisiae placed side by side and submerged in a liquid medium. This strategy allows intermediate compounds from the biosynthesis pathways to move between the hydrogels containing the bacteria and yeast, facilitating the production of rosmarinic acid. Conventional single-culture approaches using either bacteria or yeast to produce plant-derived chemicals like rosmarinic acid have significant limitations. These drawbacks hinder the growth of the organisms and, consequently, the overall efficiency of production. Our co-culture technique distributes the metabolic workload between the bacteria and yeast, leading to enhanced synthesis efficiency.

Furthermore, this co-culture strategy leverages the strengths of each organism. Bacteria excel at synthesizing smaller molecules, while yeast is more proficient in assembling these smaller molecules into larger products. However, an obstacle of using a co-culture of bacteria and yeast is the tendency for bacteria to outcompete yeast over time. To counter this, we have devised a solution to encapsulate the bacteria and yeast populations within separate hydrogels. This separation prevents the bacterial culture from encroaching on the yeast culture, maintaining biological containment.

Our self-constructed 3D bioprinter, equipped with two channels, serves as a blueprint for employing microbe-laden hydrogel systems in a cost-effective and adaptable manner for synthesis purposes.


Business



Company Description

Initiated by the largest synthetic biology competition called International Genetically Engineered Machine Competition, created by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the project consists of students specializing in different areas from the University of Rochester (U of R). They are interested in using synthetic biology as a solution to optimize the production of plant-derived chemicals, especially for valuable medicinal plants that are about to go extinct. The RoSynth project will present the core asset of the start-up company, RoSynth Biotechnologies.


Mission Statement

RoSynth Biotechnologies’ mission is to develop an efficient, cost-effective synthesis of plant-derived molecules for individuals, organizations, and companies regardless of climate and geographical agricultural restrictions due to the increased shortages in the local area. Additionally, we are focused on promoting interdisciplinary research within a supportive setting and utilizing diverse platforms to introduce our products. This investment serves as a stepping stone for the future expansion of our company into the healthcare sector.


Location

The headquarters and research center of RoSynth Biotechnologies will be located in Rochester, New York, United States


Current Team Structure

Position Name Role Description iGEM Team Role Member Context
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Making major operating decisions and managing company operations Team Leader, Wetlab & Hardware (Bioprinter) Team Elizabeth Martin B. S. Microbiology
Chief Operating Officer (COO) Managing daily business operations, developing business strategies and managing human resources activities Policy and Practice Manager, Wetlab & Hardware Team Wenqi Di B.S. Biomedical Engineering, Minoring in Business
Chief Product Officer (CPO) Promoting innovation within the company through research, the creation of new products, processes, and technologies Science Manager, Wetlab Team Lead Katelyn Freebern B.S. Microbiology
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Managing financial statements of RoSynth and making major financial decisions with the CEO Fundraising Manager, Wetlab & Modeling Team Minhui Liu B.S. Microbiology, Minoring in Psychology
Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Managing every aspect of technology within the company Safety Manager, Wetlab & Hardware Team Ines Drissi Qeytoni B.S. Biomedical Engineering
Chief Information Officer (CIO) Managing and enhancing computer systems and technology resources Software Manager, Co-Wiki Manager, Wetlab & Hardware Team Medha Pan B.S. Molecular Genetics, Minoring in Bioethics
Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Creating marketing plans, and directing marketing efforts through multiple channels Hardware Manager, Video Manager, Hardware (Bioink) & Modeling Team Allie Tay B.S. Biomedical Engineering, Minoring in Journalism
Chief Learning Officer (CLO) and Public Relations Manager Managing learning strategy and people development within RoSynth Education and Public Relations Manager, Wetlab and Modeling Team Catherine Xie B.S. Statistics and B.S. Molecular Genetics
Research and Development (R&D) Manager Promoting innovation within the company through building models simulating experiments in the real-world to test hypotheses, as well as enhancing current product offerings Modeling Manager, Wetlab & Modeling Team Xupei Ou B.S. Molecular Genetics, Minoring in Mathematics and Creative Writing
Art and Design Manager and Research and Development (R&D) Implementation of visual communications to fulfill RoSynth's marketing or advertising goals Co-Wiki Manager, Graphic Design Manager, Human Practice & Wetlab Team Arianna Slupik B.S. Molecular Genetics, Minoring in Bioethics

Future Company Structure

RoSynth Biotechnologies is set to emerge as a derivative entity originating from the University of Rochester (U of R) and the 2023 iGEM Team Rochester. The research collective, directed by the principal investigator of the 2023 iGEM Team Rochester, will spearhead the efforts of this venture. The governing body of RoSynth Biotechnologies will encompass the current principal of U of R, investors, and members of the 2023 iGEM Team Rochester.

Figure 1. RoSynth Biotechnologies future company structure.

Products and Services

RoSynth Parallel Culture Dual-channel 3D Bioprinting System

Research regarding embedding microorganisms and co-culturing them in hydrogel for biochemical production is a new and emerging field and the project was inspired by a recent paper from nature. Biomanufacturing by synthetic biological methods has just been emerging in the field compared to existing traditional chemical manufacturing methods, it’s uniqueness in enhanced manufacturing yield, independence in climate, geopolitical, and geographical limitations and sustainable manufacturing production process has yet to be a preferred method for cosmetic, chemical, pharmaceutical industries for optimizing their biomanufacturing processes.

RoSynth Biotechnologies aims to be a leading pioneer in research and development of this field and also the market in general, and RoSynth’s project currently focusing on two products and they can be integrated into a parallel 3D bioprinting system to further optimizing the production of chemicals/ drugs in need.


Value Proposition

Our optimized 3D bioprinter is a novel biomanufacturing technique that provides an efficient, cost-effective synthesis of plant-derived molecules for individuals, organizations, and companies who want a reliable production of complex chemicals regardless of climate and geographical agricultural restrictions.


Intellectual Property

We are considering the possibility of pursuing a utility patent for the components we have designed. These components are responsible for converting a standard 3D printer into a dual-channel bioprinter, and they also encompass the software elements we are currently developing. Unfortunately, our hydrogel co-culture system is unlikely to be eligible for patenting, as it has been previously discussed in a research paper. In reality, none of our project components can be patented if we decide to submit them for the iGEM competition, as all information published on our wiki becomes open intellectual property. However, it's worth noting that as part of the entrepreneurship aspect of the competition, teams explore strategies for commercializing their projects, including the potential process of securing a patent for their technology.

Consulting with Dr. Shalini Sitaraman Menezes helped our project’s strategic future IP plan:

In our biosynthesis venture, the decision to keep or utilize the patent we obtain hinges on our ability to secure essential resources like machinery, chemicals, and biological materials for a successful business operation. If we're confident in acquiring these resources, retaining the patent as the foundation for our startup makes strategic sense. Alternatively, if this proves impractical, we can opt to sell or license the patent, providing capital without the extensive financial and operational commitments of running a business.

The choice between a usage license and patent acquisition is crucial. A usage license is like "renting" intellectual property rights, enabling both our team and potential licensees to work on the invention while making periodic payments. Conversely, patent acquisition involves a one-time purchase, granting exclusive intellectual property rights that can be transferred to another entity.

Assessing the patent's value for sale or licensing is a subjective process, influenced by factors like the invention's development stage and commercialization status. Patents are territorially limited, requiring separate applications in different countries, each following specific regulations. Obtaining a patent necessitates demonstrating the invention's non-obviousness to an expert in the field, a subjective determination by a patent examiner. Encountering similar technology during the patent application process may necessitate significant product redesign. Finally, a provisional patent application, while not providing legal protection, offers a cost-effective way to document and secure an invention, potentially serving as a basis for legal challenges. Expected patent application fees range from $100 to $200 for our team, but attorney assistance may cost between $3,000 and $5,000.


Market Analysis



Market Segmentation for Potential Customers and Unmet Needs

As a startup synthetic biomanufacturing company, RoSynth plans to market the parallel 3D printing device in Rochester, NY and utilize it as a testing ground to assess product demand, sensitivity to product pricing, marketing expenses, manufacturing costs, and the ability to scale up production before venturing into more extensive markets such as different places in United States, China, and India. We plan to extend the markets to the European Union and the broader Australasia region after future specific market demand analyses.

We are targeting potential customers in the cosmetic, nutraceutical industries, as well as academia.

Figure 2. RoSynth prospective customer structure.
Cosmetic Industry:
  • Customizable skincare product ingredients and quantities with the exact formulation ingredients.
  • Bioavailability for the skin delivery by traditional topical formulations is less than 2% of each dose applied [1]. The 3D biomanufacturing approach has several benefits when compared to conventional manufacturing methods, including the ability for one-step fabrication and customization [2]. In addition, the utilization of 3D printing has demonstrated promise in enhancing the effectiveness of skin delivery and encouraging adherence among users [3].
  • Our system enables printing complex compound ingredients and allows for anti-aging and antioxidant creams [4] that could be customized for different people.
  • Branding 3D printed skincare ingredient method through co-culture could stand us out among the competitors and differentiate ourselves from the market competition.
Nutraceutical/Pharmaceutical Industry:
  • We could personalize the ingredients needed by different people.
  • Research has shown rosmarinic acid can prevent tumorigenesis due to its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties [5]. Rosmarinic acid can inhibit the growth of tumor cells and therefore widely used in tumor therapies [5]. To increase the bioavailability of rosmarinic acid, several technologies was developed such as modifying the excipients and developing drug delivery systems etc. [5].
Research Labs/ Healthcare Research & Development Sector:
  • From our interview with Dr. Alshakim Nelson, he was particularly interested in our customizable duo-channel 3D bioprinter and mentioned that such device has a great market potential used by different research groups for their projects.

I. Total Addressable Market by Our Parallel Culture System

The total addressable market (TAM) represents the largest market opportunity of a specific product or solution. To determine RoSynth’s total addressable market, we assumed that by proofing our method, we will expand our product lines to all other valuable botanical ingredients.

Following the introduction of our 3D bioprinting system to the industry and the launch of optimized chemical production in the North American market, our objective is to expand our offerings initially to the Asia-Pacific and European regions. These regions are prominent in the botanical ingredients market, particularly within the personal care and cosmetic industries, as highlighted by Frost & Sullivan’s Global Botanical Ingredients Growth Opportunities Report 2023 [4]. Our expansion will be conducted with a strong commitment to upholding human rights and a comprehensive consideration of bioethical, environmental, and socio-economic factors throughout our development process. According to Frost & Sullivan's revenue forecast by region for the period 2020-2030, it is projected that the botanical ingredient market in Asia-Pacific will attain an estimated revenue of $1,424.5 million, while the North American market is anticipated to reach $743.1 million, and the European market is expected to reach $461.5 million by the year 2030 with a CAGR of 6.7% [4].


II. Serviceable Available Market by Our 3D Bioprinter

In recent years, Additive Manufacturing (AM) has seen significant technological progress, advancing to a point where it is widely adopted by major sectors like manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, and healthcare for the large-scale 3D printing of components [6]. We are specifically targeting the Laboratory Chemical Reagents Market when first entering the market with small to medium sized customizable chemical productions by our synthetic biotechnologies. Biopharmaceutical research labs had the highest budget increase of 4% in 2022 compared to 2021 [7].


Figure 3. Impact of global laboratories supply chain challenges (2022) - adapted from Frost & Sullivan [7].

III. Serviceable Obtainable Market

The United States has one of the largest pharmaceutical, cosmetic and chemical markets in the world. Since RoSynth is still in its early stages, it would be advantageous to develop this biomanufacturing system where industry and academia work closely together.

The New York State Department of Development's Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR) programs and centers emphasize the importance of partnering with industry to leverage New York State's technological advantages to produce new products [8], and the University of Rochester's venture capital can also help make our projects successful. The state also offers other innovation development support resources, including financial incentives, to promote university collaboration, research and innovation, providing an ideal entrepreneurial incubation environment for RoSynth’s development.

We can easily build distribution channels in-house from our short-term focus on the greater Rochester area for rosmarinic acid manufacturing markets as well as our 3D bioprinters. The University of Rochester has more than 3,000 researchers and more than 500 laboratories dedicated to scientific research, and Rochester's 2021 research spending was $409 million [9].

Nationally, preliminary federal budget authorizations for R&D facilities total $169.9 billion in 2022 which has increased 5% from 2021 [10]. Proposed federal budget authorization for R&D plants in fiscal 2023 was $191 billion which has increased extensively by 12.7% from 2022 [10].

Academia and government spend approximately 62% of their budgets on purchasing chemicals and reagents etc. [8]. This puts our SOM at $253 million annually in Rochester and $118 billion nationally, with numbers only growing year over year [11].


Exit Plan

We are planning on deploying a Merge and Acquisition Strategy (M&A) and merging with a similar yet larger biotechnology firm with similar operations after the proof-of-concept stage [12]. Another feasible plan could be licensing agreements with strategic partners with already well-established companies which can provide immediate funding and resources; however, careful negotiation is required to protect both parties’ products and rights. The firm is ideally having experiences on FDA clinical trials and is able to take its biotechnologies for upscaling production such as DuPont and Johnson & Johnson. Before the Merge and Acquisition step, we are planning to prioritize our research and development and upscaling strategic development to build a strong portfolio and increase our competitiveness and attract potential investors. By talking with Ms. Shalini Sitaraman Menezes, we also are planning to apply for intellectual property protection, if necessary, to further drive up our revenue and increase the company’s liquidity after entering the market.

After entering the market, we are anticipating to participate in the global nutraceutical botanical ingredients which had revenue of $1,211.0 million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach $2,040.5 million in 2030, and the demand is only increasing [4].


SWOT Analysis

Currently, commercial 3D bioprinters cost more ($10,000-150,000) and have low customization capabilities [13]. A few companies have developed dual-channel bioprinters such as FELIX BIOPrinter, which is more expensive at about $29,411.76 [14], proving that our solution is highly feasible and it’s more accessible for average users. Our customizable partner culture 3D bioprinter is actually a very promising product for sale.

To better illustrate our idea, SWOT analysis is used to better think about our strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to better design and market our products.

Figure 4. RoSynth’s SWOT Analysis of bacteria and yeast parallel culture 3D printing system.

Competitive Analysis Grid

Besides the accessibility consideration and enhancing user experiences, RoSynth also carefully evaluates our competitiveness with the current agricultural and extraction method.

Table 1. RoSynth’s Competitive Analysis Grid for some unique advantages of the novel manufacturing method.

Development Plans and Stakeholder Analysis

Furthermore, we also carefully assess, and iterate on their business model by using The Business Model Canvas. We will use this model to strategically plan out our customer segments, value propositions, channels, revenue streams, and cost structure providing a holistic view of our business and identifying potential gaps or inefficiencies, test hypotheses, and continue design or refine our sustainable and profitable business model that cater to customer needs, create value, and drive growth in a dynamic and competitive business environment for our product developments.


I. Business Model Canvas (BMC)
Figure 5. RoSynth’s Business Model Canvas for parallel culture 3D bioprinter.

Finances

I. Cost Structure

Our primary area of investment will be directed towards research and development, representing the largest allocation of our capital. This allocation encompasses expenses related to completing proof of concept, conducting preclinical and clinical trials, and covering the costs associated with the registration process for scaling up production. As our company advances, we will need to procure materials in larger quantities, allowing us to negotiate more favorable unit prices in order to achieve economies of scale. In general, it's common for startups to experience an approximate 11% cost overrun for marketing purposes [15].


II. Pricing

If interested to learn more, check our hardware page for the cost breakdown of our 3D bioprinter.

Table 2. Total cost of the 3D bioprinter.
Table 3. Total cost of the printed parts (additive design on the printer).

III. Funding

The combined system of our products and methods is novel, completely new. Because of this, we can rely on additional support from other agencies throughout the development process. Most production costs are largely concentrated in the later stages, by which time we have implemented our exit strategy: mergers and acquisitions.

During our discovery phase, iGEM to proof-of-concept, the majority of our funding will come from parents, alumni, friends, crowdfunding, university support and grants. However, we understand that strategic large investors may play a key role for our later success. We will rely on grants, crowdfunding and business angel investors as our manufacturing methods. During the preclinical and clinical trial phase, we will seek support from venture capital, initial public offerings (IPOs), and private equity investment.

There are many funding opportunities which provides an ideal environment for incubating our project:

Local funding sources in the Upstate New York region, including Excell Technology Ventures [16], Simon School Venture Fund [17], Rochester Angel Network [18], Cayuga Venture Fund [19], and several others, provide critical financial support and resources for RoSynth. Also, Excell Technology Ventures in Rochester focuses on Seed and Early Stage investments that can also contribute to RoSynth’s regional economic development. Furthermore, we have the Simon School Venture Fund from University of Rochester's renowned business school which can offer extra funding opportunities and expertise. The Rochester Angel Network connects accredited investors with promising startups, while Cayuga Venture Fund supports startups in various industries. Additional resources like Launch NY [20], Chloe Capital [21], Armory Square Ventures [22], and RIT Venture Fund [23] further enrich the local ecosystem, fostering innovation and entrepreneurial growth of RoSynth in the Greater Rochester area.

Local incubators and accelerators in the Rochester, New York area, including Luminate [24], NextCorps [25], and Venture Creations [26], offer comprehensive support services to startups at various stages of development, as well as manufacturing businesses. They serve as invaluable resources for nurturing early-stage companies and promoting growth. Additionally, RoSynth is actively seeking additional support by participating in business competitions such as 43North [27], which provides $5 million annual investments for pre-seed and seed stage startups in Buffalo, NY, and the New York Business Plan Competition (NYBPC) [28], aimed at fostering entrepreneurship and innovation across New York's colleges and universities. These competitions offer opportunities for RoSynth to gain financial backing and valuable exposure, further enhancing RoSynth’s prospects for success.


Roadmap / Milestones
Figure 6. RoSynth’s Development Stage Roadmap with different milestones.

Future

I. Risk Assessment

RoSynth actively seeks to identify and address potential challenges and uncertainties at different phases of its project development. Through a systematic assessment of risks throughout the project's evolution, RoSynth gains the insights needed to make well-informed decisions regarding resource allocation, strategy adjustments, and proactive measures to mitigate setbacks. This proactive approach not only strengthens RoSynth's capacity to maintain course and achieve milestones but also enhances its overall resilience and adaptability in the ever-changing entrepreneurial environment, thereby augmenting its prospects for sustained success.

Project Phase Risk Assessment
Phase Risk Possible Solutions
Brainstorming Not practical Gather more ideas and discuss the practicality with the team
Proof-of-concept 1. Experimental mistakes and challenges for biosynthesis 2. Purity of the product Determine the cause of the failure and consult experts to modify the synthesis method accordingly.
Preclinical Trials Rosmarinic acid has low efficacy drug development with no strong drug indications Implementing adjustments to functional groups, changing the scaffold, altering stereochemistry, or introducing substitutions to enhance particular properties by consulting with Dr. Zaixin Chen
Clinical Trials Funding challenge Fundraising, roadtalk to get extra funding from the investors
Upscaling Technical difficulties when developing the liquid handling robot arm Consult expert

II. Upscaling Production

In order to produce products at the scale required by Big Chemicals, we have developed a detailed upscaling plan. You can read more about the this on our project implementation plan.


III. Stakeholders’ Opinions

Throughout the course of our project, we have established numerous valuable connections with stakeholders and experts. This includes individuals like Dr. Zaixin Chen from BioScene Pharma, Dr. Alshakim Nelson from University of Washington, Mr. Jack Johnson from Cayman Chemical, Dr. Elizabeth Onderko from Capra Biosciences, and Mr. Bill Saltzstein from Code Blue Consulting. Furthermore, we have taken into account the perspectives and impact of various stakeholders who will play a role in our company's operations. You can find additional information about our stakeholders and experts by visiting the provided link.


IV. Long-Term Impacts

We have given significant attention to impact analysis throughout our project. The direct consequences of our products will involve alleviating local shortages and enabling global access to our bioprinting systems, irrespective of climate or geographical constraints. We are highly positive to utilize our system to develop drugs and secure approvals from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), our printing technology will drive a shift in demand away from traditional farming methods and lengthy shipping processes toward more straightforward and convenient procedures. In the long run, this transformation will contribute to substantial economic growth for both the Greater Rochester area and the broader U.S. economy. Furthermore, since individuals, organizations, and companies can customize the chemicals they produce and the quantities they require, there will be reduced waiting times and cost savings through minimized shipping.

Indirect impacts encompass factors such as greenhouse gas emissions stemming from product production and transportation, as well as concerns related to over-harvesting of wild populations and unregulated agricultural practices, particularly in the cultivation of herbs. Additionally, there are considerations regarding potential long-term effects resulting from exposure to microorganisms during various stages of production, transportation, or environmental release. The impact of yeast and bacteria escaping from laboratory settings on the health of individuals remains uncertain, although stringent safety and security measures make such occurrences unlikely. Nonetheless, our commitment lies in significantly mitigating the release of microorganisms into the environment through the development of comprehensive policies and regulations that discourage dual-use scenarios in the project, as previously emphasized.


V. Company Values

“Working with the right people” - Diverse Skill Sets and Backgrounds

Our team consists of individuals from a wide range of backgrounds who share a common passion for synthetic biology. Our team members come from diverse cultures and locations, such as the United States, Morocco, China, Poland, India and Malaysia, which enriches our problem-solving capabilities with a myriad of perspectives. Furthermore, we highly appreciate the valuable guidance and assistance we receive from tutors and teaching assistants who bring diverse experiences and backgrounds to the table as well. Many thanks to team supervisors, Dr. Anne S. Meyer, Dr. Alexis Stein, and Dr. Nancy Chen, who possesses extensive expertise, knowledge, and skills, and plays a pivotal role in helping us navigate and resolve complex challenges.

Additionally, the University of Rochester's established reputation and credibility give us a competitive advantage in the startup landscape. We also have the potential to receive support from the university such as the Ain Center for Entrepreneurship, as well as family friends of our team members. We identify potential partners and cultivating long-term relationships with these companies is invaluable. With the combined efforts of these individuals, we have a strong belief in our capacity to successfully develop RoSynth into a thriving startup.


  1. Jiao, Y., Stevic, M., Buanz, A., Uddin, M. J., & Tamburic, S. (2022). Current and Prospective Applications of 3D Printing in Cosmetics: A Literature Review. Cosmetics, 9(6), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9060115 Accessed 15 Sept. 2023.
  2. Economidou, S. N., Lamprou, D. A., & Douroumis, D. (2018). 3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 544(2), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.031 Accessed 18 Sept. 2023.
  3. Menditto, Enrica, et al.“Patient Centric Pharmaceutical Drug Product Design—the Impact on Medication Adherence.” Pharmaceutics, vol. 12, no. 1, 3 Jan. 2020, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023035/, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12010044. Accessed 21 Sept. 2023.
  4. Frost & Sullivan. (2023, May 22). Global Botanical Ingredients Growth Opportunities. https://store.frost.com/wip/PE78-01-00-00-00 Accessed 21 Sept. 2023.
  5. Zhao, J., Xu, L., Jin, D., Xin, Y., Tian, L., Wang, T., Zhao, D., Wang, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). Rosmarinic Acid and Related Dietary Supplements: Potential Applications in the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer. Biomolecules, 12(10), 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101410 Accessed 18 Sept. 2023.
  6. “Emerging Opportunities of Metal 3D Printing in Mass Production.” Store.Frost.com, 22 Dec. 2022, store.frost.com/wip/DA84-01-00-00-00. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023.
  7. “Global Laboratory Product Purchasing Trends, 2022–2023.” Store.Frost.com, 30 Mar. 2023, store.frost.com/wip/K8C7-01-00-00-00. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023.
  8. “Innovation Development Support | Empire State Development.” Esd.ny.gov, 1 Nov. 2016, esd.ny.gov/innovation-development-support. Accessed 24 Sept. 2023.
  9. “URMC & UR Research Laboratories - University of Rochester Medical Center.” www.urmc.rochester.edu, www.urmc.rochester.edu/labs.aspx#:~:text=Explore%20Our%20URMC%20%26%20UR%20Research. Accessed 25 Sept. 2023.
  10. “Federal R&D Funding by Budget Function | NSF - National Science Foundation.” Ncses.nsf.gov, ncses.nsf.gov/data-collections/federal-budget-function/2023. Accessed 25 Sept. 2023.
  11. Hayes, Adam. “Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A).” Investopedia, 17 Sept. 2022, www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mergersandacquisitions.asp. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023.
  12. “NSF – NCSES Academic Institution Profiles – Rankings by Total R&D Expenditures.” Ncsesdata.nsf.gov, ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?method=rankingBySource&ds=herd. Accessed 24 Sept. 2023.
  13. Ioannidis, Konstantinos, et al. “A Custom Ultra-Low-Cost 3D Bioprinter Supports Cell Growth and Differentiation.” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 8, 4 Nov. 2020, p. 580889, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676439/, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.580889. Accessed 24 Sept. 2023.
  14. “FELIX BIOPrinter BundleDefault Title.” Project 3D Printers, project3dprinters.com/products/felix-bioprinter-bundle?currency=USD&variant=31873561493578&stkn=b8c2e19daa00&srsltid=AfmBOooWZr51zxXdEUD3YBFcsfrJeYNfNguSRLVHq0GiuiAQ7GPwN4EJVd8. Accessed 25 Sept. 2023.
  15. “Startup Marketing Budget: How to Write an Incredible Budget for 2023.” Blog.hubspot.com, blog.hubspot.com/marketing/startup-marketing-budget#:~:text=Generally%2C%20startups%20should%20spend%20around. Accessed 24 Sept. 2023.
  16. EXCELL – Invests in New York. excellny.com/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  17. “Venture Fund.” Simon Business School, simon.rochester.edu/clubs/simon-school-venture-capital-fund. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  18. “Rochester Angel Network.” www.rochesterangels.com, www.rochesterangels.com/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  19. Cayuga Venture Fund – Investing in New York State Startups. cayugaventures.com/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  20. “Home.” Launch NY, launchny.org/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  21. A Gardner. “Chloe Capital | vc Firm Investing in Women.” Chloe Capital, chloecapital.com/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  22. “Armory Square Ventures.” Armory Square Ventures, www.armorysv.com/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  23. “RIT Venture Fund | RIT.” www.rit.edu, www.rit.edu/venturefund. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  24. “Home.” Luminate, 21 Sept. 2023, luminate.org/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  25. “Home.” NextCorps, nextcorps.org/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  26. “Venture Creations Incubator | RIT.” www.rit.edu, www.rit.edu/incubator/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  27. 43North — It’s Happening Here 43North Startup Accelerator. 4 Feb. 2016, www.43north.org/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.
  28. “New York Business Plan Competition.” New York Business Plan Competition, nybpc.org/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2023.