Image


DESCRIPTION




Nomincee for the Best Therapeutics award

description

Antibiotic resistance: The silent pandemic


Antibiotic resistance is a natural phenomenon that emerged chaotically due to our overconsumption of antibiotics. Nowadays, it represents one of the biggest threats to our world for alimentary safety, public health, and development.

Antibiotic resistance is the phenomenon by which bacteria become resistant to antibiotics.

Antibiotics are mostly synthetic molecules but can also be natural or semi-synthetic, introduced in our society with the discovery of Penicillin by Alexander Flemming in 1928. Those molecules, ineffective against viruses and fungi (antifungals are used against them), are specific to one or a group of bacteria and can slow down their growth or even kill them. Different types of antibiotics exist, determined by their way of action (some will act on DNA replication, others on essential proteins synthesis...).

description1

Figure 1 : Explanation of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance mechanisms.

Over the last century, they helped to fight and drastically reduce the fatality of once-deadly diseases, including ear infections.

But bacteria exposed to antibiotics evolve and develop defense mechanisms, allowing them to escape their actions. This phenomenon affects both the bacteria that cause infections (pathogenic bacteria) and the generally harmless bacteria that are naturally present in our bodies (commensal bacteria). But it also concerns bacteria in animals (pets and, to a greater extent, food-producing animals) and in the environment. Once resistance has developed in one or more of these bacterial species, it can be transmitted to other species, contributing to the spread of the phenomenon. Antibiotics thus become ineffective, and we can no longer treat infections caused by resistant bacteria.[7]

This is not a new phenomenon. Since the discovery of penicillin, each new generation of antibiotics has seen the emergence of corresponding resistance mechanisms. The first resistance to penicillin appeared in 1940. The first multi-resistant bacteria (MRB), which resists multiple antibiotics, appeared in the 1970s, while highly resistant bacteria (HRB), which resists almost all antibiotics, emerged in the 2000s. [4]

Antibiotic resistance is spreading extremely rapidly, affecting everything and everyone, making it one of the greatest threats to global public health, animal health, food safety, biodiversity, and the global economic balance.

Global public health insecurity is exacerbated by the lack of new antibiotic discoveries over the last 20 years, a situation which, according to the AMR, does not seem to be improving, as this sector is unattractive to pharmaceutical companies. [6]

fig2

Figure 2 : Pharmaceutical R&D investments in 2003 and 2013


Antimicrobial resistance in figures :

124 806

Number of patients with resistant bacterial infections in France in 2019

1,3 millions

Number of deaths worldwide due to antibiotic resistance in 2019

10 millions

Estimated number of deaths worldwide due to antibiotic resistance in 2050


fig3

Figure 3 : All-age rate of deaths attributable to and associated with bacterial antimicrobial resistance by GBD region, 2019, [2]


oxa

Impact on the global economy, poverty and development

Antibiotic resistance is not only a health threat but also a threat to global economic equilibrium. One of the UN's main objectives for 2030 is to end extreme poverty in the world. Given the costs associated with the increasingly complex and lengthy treatment of patients suffering from bacterial infections and the impact of high mortality, this objective could be called into question. According to the World Bank, the diversity of this phenomenon makes it one of the greatest threats to the economy. It could cause economic damage on a scale at least comparable to that caused by the 2008 financial crisis.

The impact on poverty would be particularly significant. By 2050, antimicrobial resistance could force another 28.3 million people into extreme poverty, including 26.2 million in low-income countries.

"The scale and nature of this economic threat could wipe out hard-won economic development gains and move us further away from our goals of ending extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity."

World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim

"if nothing is done to curb antibiotic resistance, it is the poor who will suffer most. This is why we need to treat this problem as a crucial development issue," says Margaret Chan, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO).


fig4

Figure 4 : Forecasts of the economic impact of antibiotic resistance in 2050, graph inspired by the 2016 World Bank Group study [5].


Carbapenems’s case

fig5

Figure 5 : Mapping the spread of KPC,NDM and OXA-48 producing bacteria, 2017 [3]

Carbapenems are antibiotics known to be broad-spectrum. They are effective against many different types of bacteria, especially ones already resistant to other antibiotics. This is why they are seen as the "last chance" antibiotics. However, with the widespread use of these antibiotics, the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria has increased rapidly.

Infections caused by bacteria producing carbapenemases, an enzyme that can hydrolyze carbapenems, have experienced unprecedented intercontinental spread and proliferation and continue to present a therapeutic challenge.

The most effective carbapenemases for carbapenem hydrolysis and geographic spread are the KPC, VIM, IMP, NDM, and OXA-48 types.



Figure 6 : Sum up of the carbapenems classification [1]

fig6


Our project : SuperBugBuster

description

Our project aims to prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance while focusing on carbapenemase, an enzyme produced by carbapenem-resistant bacteria. To achieve this, we developed a plasmid carrying a CRISPR dCas-9 fused with a mutagenesis module as well as a BacPROTAC system

Our ultimate goal is to create a system capable of combating different antibiotic resistances. By targeting a specific bacterial strain, we aim to transfer the system through conjugation to eliminate antibiotic resistance in a bacterial population.

fig7








Figure 7: Overview of our Project with 2 tools: CRISPR and BacPROTAC




The aim is to use donor bacteria that will transmit a plasmid containing the CRISPR-dCas9 system as well as BacPROTAC to resensitize the recipient bacteria to an antibiotic instead of just killing it.



What is SuperBugBuster ?

A TOOL COMBINING SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, BIOINFORMATICS, BIOMATHEMATICS AND HUMAN PRACTICES

SuperBugBuster operates on two fronts: a synthetic biology approach aimed at reversing past errors by eliminating and preventing the spread of resistance. And an education and awareness front aimed at teaching people how to use antibiotics more effectively so that technical efforts work in the long term. Sustainability is indeed the watchword of our project. We need a solution that works quickly but, above all, lasts over time.

You can find all aspects of our study leading up to our awareness campaign on the HP and Education pages.

We chose to focus on carbapenem resistance and, more specifically, on the OXA-48 carbapenemase. We aspire to contribute to the scientific advances that will enable existing carbapenems to retain their clinical efficacy and thus save lives. Using synthetic biology, we are trying to design a genuine tool for combating resistance: we combine different methods and improve them.

Our biotechnological tool was created in several major stages, which you can find on our experiments page:

  • Design of the CRISPR tool/biobrick:

  • - Construction of the plasmid containing the guide RNAs

    - Deletion of unnecessary sequences in the plasmid containing the origin of replication and the origin of transfer

    - Assembly of the TetR_dCas9_CDA1_Ugi system

    - Assembly of various intermediate plasmids by Gateway cloning

  • Development of the OXA48-specific nanobody for BacPROTACs:

  • - Modeling of the nanobody structure.

    - Insertion of the nanobody into an overexpression plasmid vector.

    - Overproduction of the three best nanobody variants.

    - Construction of a plasmid containing OXA48 for CRISPR testing.

  • Implementation of CRISPR assays:

  • - Use of the CRISPR tool on the plasmid containing OXA48.

    - Characterization of CRISPR tool efficiency:

    - Assessment of the activity of the CRISPR tool on the OXA48 target.

    - Measurement of genomic editing or target inhibition efficiency.


    Figure 8 :Comic strip taking up the concept of SuperBugBuster: repairing the mistakes of the past with synthetic biology and educating sustainably with human practices


    Our team comprises very diverse profiles, a strength on which we have based our project by integrating much more than just synthetic biology. All our achievements have been possible thanks to the constant support of our IP and advisors.

    fig9

    Figure 9: picture of our software


    The design of our biological tool was constantly linked to our human practices study. We conducted numerous interviews with experts in antibiotics, doctors, veterinarians, ethicists, and biodiversity specialists. We aimed to confront SuperBugBuster with their opinions to perfect it, make it safer and even more sustainable.

    Our team has designed a software program to create the guide RNAs needed for binding to resistance genes. This software is applicable to any gene and any context. It is also compatible with various CRISPR tools: CRISPR-dCas9, CRISPRi, and CRISPR-dCas9 with a cytidine deaminase. This software was essential to support the design of the plasmid used for biological manipulations and to guarantee the safety of our tool, which will not induce mutations in other genes of the bacterial genome.

    fig10

    Figure 10: One of our members in an interview with Claude Mabilat


    Image

    Figure 11: Simulation of our IBM model

    Our team also carried out mathematical modeling to predict the proper functioning of our in silico tool. The model then makes choosing initial conditions for the test phases possible, ensuring optimal operation.

    With all of that, SuperBugBuster is much more than just a biological construction. Our tool is defined based on 5 major concepts to answer a problem like antibiotic resistance.

    fig11

    Figure 12: SuperBugBuster key characteristics


    How SuperBugBuster works ?

    fig12

    Figure 13 : Big steps of SuperBugBuster


    Bio

    CRISPR

    June 29

    Our first step is to modify the bacteria's genome to eliminate the resistance.

    Continue reading
    crispr
    Bio

    PROTAC

    June 29

    Secondly, we plan to use the Bacprotac system to degrade the resistance proteins.

    Continue reading
    protac

    CRISPR dcas 9 with Cytidine deaminase

    As the resistance of the bacteria comes from a gene carried by a plasmid or located in the DNA, the best solution was to inactivate this gene. Indeed, if it is inactivated, the proteins won't be produced, and it will conduce to the loss of the resistance.

    To do so, we planned to use the molecular scissors CRISPR. However, cutting a gene would lead to the death of the bacteria. So, it was better to induce a mutation on the gene to inactivate it, resulting in a truncated non-functional protein. Thanks to that, when bacteria die and release their DNA, other bacteria in the ecosystem cannot integrate the functional carbapenem resistance gene in their genome by natural transformation.

    The cytosine deaminase, a base editor tool, was ideal for introducing a stop codon in the gene coding for carbapenemases. So we fused it with the CRIPSR-dCAS9 system, which would lead the editor tool to the right sequence thanks to its gRNA designed specifically for that. To achieve this goal, we designed a modular system that consists of four independent plasmids:

  • The first one (A) consists of an unstable miniF plasmid carrying the origin of transfer RP4 and a chloramphenicol resistance cassette.
  • The second plasmid (B) contains the CRISPR-dCas9 cytosine-base editor tool, expressed under promoter ptet inducible by anhydrotetracycline, and the gene tetR, encoding the Tet repressor.
  • The third plasmid (C) carries tandem repeats of sgRNA-expression units (2 or 4 specific guide RNAs for multiplex edition) and is the only variable module in the system. Indeed, we could imagine using other gRNAs that would be efficient against different bacteria strains than the one we'll be working with.
  • The last plasmid (D) contains the sacB counter-selectable marker for plasmid curing after editing.
  • The four independent modules are flanked by the Gateway recombination motifs (attR and attL) and should be assembled in the end in a unique LR reaction to create the final plasmid carrying the four modules.

    fig13

    Figure 14 : Our construction for Gateway Assembly


    BacPROTACs

    PROTACs are recent chemically synthesized molecules that promote the degradation of a specific protein. They have been synthesized mainly for eukaryotic cells. The latter are cells that contain a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles, whereas prokaryotic cells, like bacteria, don't have them. In eukaryotic cells, PROTACs address the target protein to the cell proteasome (a complex that will degrade unneeded or damaged proteins by proteolysis) by recruiting a molecule that will add a recognition signal: a polyubiquitin chain.

    It's only in 2022 that PROTACs have been produced for bacteria and mycobacteria (prokaryotic) [9]. For this type of organisms they are called BacPROTACs. It was a significant advance since the bacterial degradation system is completely different from the eukaryotic one with the ubiquitin system. Indeed, not all bacteria have a proteasome system: they can only have proteases (smaller molecules with catalytic domains that allow them to break down proteins). However, 80% of them possess the Clp protease system, so we decided to use it.

    But how does it work? We wanted to target a specific protein: the OXA48 carbapenemase protein. For that, our BacPROTAC will be linked to the targeted protein but also to the bacterial degradation system, which is, for the bacteria that we are interested in, ClpX:ClpP, a multi-enzymatic complex. This complex will unfold and then degrade our targeted protein.

    Through bioinformatics and especially structural biology and molecular docking, we had to find a moiety that binds to the OXA48 carbapenemase and a moiety that binds to the ClpX (once the binding activates ClpX, it'll recruit ClpP and degrade the carbapenemase). To link those two moieties, we'll use a linker.

    However, instead of injecting it into the bacteria, we want the bacteria to produce it. Inserting the BacPROTACs DNA sequence along the CRISPR system DNA sequence in a plasmid, it will be transferred by conjugation in the targeted bacteria. When activated, it will be translated into protein, and then it will degrade the carbapenemases that are already present in the cytoplasm.

    To adapt the BacPROTACs to other proteins, we only need to change the nanobody we're using. Technically, the ClpX-ClpP system is not present in all the bacteria, but it is the most present of all degradation systems. [10]

    fig14

    Figure 15 : Function of our BacPROTAC system

    For the BacPROTAC system, we designed a plasmid with a gene coding for a bifunctional molecule that looks like a PROTAC. This molecule is made of 2 parts: the Nanobody (Oxa48 ligand), which binds to OXA48, the protein of interest, and the second part with the ClpX protein, which is part of the ClpX:ClpP protein complex serving as a bacterial proteasome. A linker links these two parts.

    It works as follows: Nanobody recruits OXA48, and by proximity to ClpX, OXA48 is brought to ClpP, which is activated when bound to ClpX so that OXA48 is degraded. One advantage is that the Nanobody-linker-ClpX molecule is recyclable and will, therefore, degrade all the OXA48 present in the bacteria.


    Project potential and possibilities

    One possible application of our project is to enable gene repression in a bacterium easily. Indeed, it can be useful to repress gene expression to understand relationships between certain genes and their functions. By designing a specific guide RNA, our tool allows mutations in the gene we want to repress by creating a nonsense codon. Therefore, depending on the mutation position in the gene, the expressed protein will be non-functional.

    Furthermore, the resistance gene on the plasmid carrying the construct will allow for the selection of mutants. Additionally, the plasmid has been designed to be quickly lost, which has the advantage of no longer expressing the plasmid genes after a certain period.

    In conclusion, our tool enables the repression of a desired gene by specifying a guide RNA, and it allows for the selection of mutants without altering the genetic expression of the bacterium, except for the desired gene.

    fig15

    Figure 16: Illustrations of SuperBugBuster application fields

    We have developed a proof of concept, but it is possible to envision future therapeutic uses for our project. Indeed, our project could, for example, help combat bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Let's take carbapenems, which are antibiotics from the beta-lactam family, as an example. Most bacteria resistant to these antibiotics are found in the digestive tract, which is also the site of their propagation. These resistances are primarily present on a conjugative plasmid. Our tool can target these resistance genes and thus disable the bacteria's ability to resist antibiotics.

    This example can be applied to carbapenems but can be extrapolated to many other antibiotic resistances that complicate patient treatment. Another application could be in dermatology to combat the appearance of skin blemishes.

    It is possible to imagine solutions to combat antibiotic resistance in the environment, agriculture, and other fields. Another application is in the industrial sector. Antibiotic resistance cassettes are often used in the bioproduction of molecules of interest through biotechnology. Our tool would allow for the removal of these resistance cassettes, thereby improving the safety of individuals who come into contact with bacteria producing these molecules of interest.


    Why did we choose this subject ?

    As biology students, we are particularly concerned about the issue of antibiotic resistance. But this issue goes further than that. We are all consumers of antibiotics and can be affected by the dangerous phenomenon of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic resistance is the modern world's new pandemic, and we are all aware that anyone near or far from us could one day find themselves in a critical situation due to a lack of functional antibiotics.

    What's more, this problem deeply affects poor populations and underdeveloped countries with low levels of medicalization. It is essential to explore the human implications of this phenomenon to understand how it might be battled on a global scale.

    This problem affects human health, animals, and the environment with water pollution, for example. Therefore, every member of our team is genuinely involved in this project and impacted by the problem we are trying to tackle with our tool.

    According to Courrier International, antibiotic resistance kills around 3,500 people every day. We are committed to studying the causes and consequences of this problem to combat it more sustainably and contribute to the fight against it.

    A major issue...

    HPI
    collab

    ... for different reasons...

    ... that touchs everyone...

    team

    We quickly agreed on the subject of antibiotic resistance, and the question was how we would combat this scourge. Many inspirations guided our project. We found them by consulting experts around us and by looking at previous iGEM projects. Here is a non-exhaustive list of our inspirations :

  • A paper of the Lesterlin group published in 2021 [8]: In this paper, they present an innovative antibacterial methodology based on mobilizable plasmids that carry CRISPR/Cas systems designed to induce antibacterial activity into specifically targeted recipient strains. This study highlights the successful integration of conjugation and CRISPR/Cas systems in targeted-antibacterial-plasmids (TAPs), enabling strain-specific antibacterial activity. The researchers demonstrated the ability to selectively kill a particular bacterial strain or repress gene expression using a plasmid carrying a CRISPR module, thereby showcasing the potential of this approach in combating bacterial infections. Based on the publication, we planned to develop an alternative system using the CRISPR-Cas9 cytosine-base editor tool to introduce stop codon mutation in gene encoding carbapenemase so that when bacteria die and release their DNA, other bacteria present in the ecosystem cannot take up and integrate the functional carbapenem resistance gene in their genome.
  • Hoi, David M et al.'s paper [9], published in 2022, describes the synthesis of a specific protein degrader quite similar to the PROTAC molecule not to promote the degradation in eukaryotes but in bacteria. Hence the name BacPROTAC. This article is the first to propose and test such a construction on bacteria, from proof of concept to synthesis. Thus, they showed that the degradation of a certain protein with BacPROTAC allowed a full restoration of a certain antibiotic sensitivity against the mycobacterium in vivo.

  • These two promising papers encouraged us in our research, and we built upon them to create the future of the field. To further develop our project, our team also relied on the work done by previous iGEM teams for inspiration :

  • While many iGEM teams in the past have used the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing tool, Team Pittsburgh from Pennsylvania took a unique approach in combining CRISPR and DNA base modification. In the 2018 competition, they developed a base editing system using CRISPR-dCas9-cytosine deaminase, a widely used variant of CRISPR. Unlike traditional CRISPR-Cas9 systems that primarily focused on making insertions, deletions, or replacements in the DNA sequence, Team Pittsburgh aimed to push the boundaries and achieve precise single-nucleotide changes in the genome. They conducted experiments on the gene responsible for lactose intolerance to demonstrate the potential of their base editing system. Using the base editing system, they successfully converted the lactose-intolerant phenotype to lactose tolerance by introducing specific alterations to the gene sequence.

  • Conclusion

    team

    We began our iGEM adventure with one goal, shared by all our highly motivated student members: to combat antibiotic resistance. Today, we proudly present SuperBugBuster, a safe, sustainable, standardized, open-source, and modular biotechnology tool. With the help of our IP and the laboratories close to our team, we have contributed to achieving the global goal of "Local people solving local problems, using synthetic biology, everywhere around the world". The applications of our tool are very promising, contributing to the progress of science and society against this global scourge.


    References

    [1] Entérobactéries productrices de carbapénémase (CRE ou EPC). URL: https://www.hpci.ch/prevention/bases-theoriques/microorganismes-et-pathologies/entérobactéries-avec-carbapénémase-cre-ou

    [2] Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis 399, 629–655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(21)02724-0

    [3] Bonomo, R.A., Burd, E.M., Conly, J., Limbago, B.M., Poirel, L., Segre, J.A., Westblade, L.F., . Carbapenemase-producing organisms: A global scourge doi: 10.1093/cid/cix893.

    [4] Ministère de la santé et de la prévention, France. L’antibiorésistance : pourquoi est-ce si grave ? URL: https://sante.gouv.fr/prevention-en-sante/ les-antibiotiques-des-medicaments-essentiels-a-preserver/ des-antibiotiques-a-l-antibioresistance/article/ l-antibioresistance-pourquoi-est-ce-si-grave .

    [5] Jonas, O.B., Irwin, A., Berthe, F.C.J., Le Gall, F.G., Marquez, P.V., . Drug-resistant infec- tions : a threat to our economic future (vol. 2): final report.

    [6] Renwick, M.J., Simpkin, V., Mossialos, E., . Targeting innovation in antibiotic drug discovery and development: The need for a one health – one europe – one world framework doi:28806044.

    [7] Werth, B.J., . Carbapénèmes. URL: https://www.msdmanuals.com/fr/accueil/infections/antibiotiques/carbap%C3%A9n%C3%A8mes.

    [8] 2021. Reuter A. et al. Targeted-antibacterial-plasmids (TAPs) combining conjugation and CRISPR/Cas systems achieve strain-specific antibacterial activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Apr 6;49(6):3584-3598

    [9] Morreale, Francesca E et al. “BacPROTACs mediate targeted protein degradation in bacteria.” Cell vol. 185,13 (2022): 2338-2353.e18. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.009

    [10] Hoi, David M et al. “Clp-targeting BacPROTACs impair mycobacterial proteostasis and survival.” Cell vol. 186,10 (2023): 2176-2192.e22. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.009

    [11] Armstrong T, Fenn SJ, Hardie KR. JMM Profile: Carbapenems: a broad-spectrum antibiotic. J Med Microbiol. 2021 Dec;70(12):001462. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001462. PMID: 34889726; PMCID: PMC8744278