igem logo
Background Image

Notebook

Notebook

An overview of what we did in the lab each week to develop cELPro can be found here

Overlay Image

Welcome to our lab notebook page!

Click on the plasmids and scroll through the text to find out which experiments we did each week.


Click me
Spinning Image

Week 20

We started with an introduction to digesting, ligating and transforming plasmids, for these experiments the protocols can be found on our Experiments Page. We did a restriction digest on three plasmids, containing Elastin-Like Polypeptide (ELP) sequences. For simplicity, the sequence VPGIG will be abbreviated to ‘I’, and the sequence VPGAG[3]VPGGG[2] is abbreviated to ‘A’. The following sequences were digested:

1. I[60]-A[60] (cut with AcuI and BglI)

2. A[40]-I[60] (cut with BseRI and BglI)

3. A[60]-I[60] (cut with BseRI and BglI)

The results of the gel can be found in the following image:

These were then ligated to create the following constructs:

- I[60]-A[100]-I[60]

- I[60]-A[120]-I[60]

In addition, we ordered gBlock fragments, which encode for our crosslinking domains. These are two different Leucine zipper domains called Z1 and Z2, respectively, and the rapamycin binding domains FRB and FKBP12.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 21

We transformed the constructs from last week into Top10 competent cells. From the agar plates, we selected several colonies and grew these overnight, after which we purified the plasmid with a miniprep. To confirm that the ligation was done correctly, we did a double digestion using restriction sites just outside of our gene of interest. The results can be seen in the following image.

The ordered gBlocks had also arrived, and we digested these along with a pET24(+) vector. The gBlocks were then ligated into the empty vector.


Spinning Image

Week 22

To be even more sure we obtained the right ELP constructs, we sent two samples to be sequenced. The vectors containing the gBLocks were transformed into Top10 competent cells. However, we only got colonies for the vectors containing Z1 and Z2. After a second attempt at ligating FRB and FKBP12 into pET24(+), we digested the gBlock fragments again and finally ended up with colonies. The plates were stored in the refrigerator over the weekend.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 23

From each plate, we picked (up to) three colonies of which we made small cultures and performed colony PCR. The protocol for this can be found on our Experiments Page. With the colony PCR, we could confirm the presence of our desired gBlock within the plasmids. We then purified the plasmids containing gBLocks and continued digesting them, along with the plasmids containing the ELPs. These digested fragments were then ligated to obtain the following constructs:

- Z1- I[60]-A[100]-I[60]-Z2

- Z2- I[60]-A[100]-I[60]-Z2

- Z1- I[60]-A[120]-I[60]-Z2

- Z2- I[60]-A[120]-I[60]-Z2

The plasmids were transformed into Top10 cells, colonies were picked and grown into small cultures over the weekend.


Spinning Image

Week 24

We continued by miniprepping the plasmids and sending samples such that they could be sequenced. Cloning of the FRB and FKBP12 constructs also continued, similar to the zipper constructs.

We also started trying out different ways of making microscopy samples of our bacteria, because the eventual goal was to do FRAP experiments on them. By placing a thin agarose pad on top of the bacteria, we were able to immobilize and image them. The different methods that were used can be found in our protocol book on the Experiments Page.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 25

We had some trouble cloning this week since our digestions did not seem to work properly. We found out that multiple aliquots of the BglI restriction enzyme were not working. The freezer in which they were stored was set at -30°C, which led us to believe it might negatively affect the enzyme’s efficiency since the recommended storing temperature is -20°C. Luckily, one of our supervisors had a stock of BglI available stored at the right temperature. When using this stock, the enzyme cut perfectly.

Since our first zipper-containing constructs were cloned successfully, we started expressing the proteins by first transforming the plasmids into BL21(DE3). Then, small cultures were made and when the OD600 reached 0.6, they were transferred to large cultures. To check if the right proteins were expressed, we took samples at several time points and ran the cell lysate over an SDS-PAGE gel.

After 36h of protein expression, the cultures were centrifuged, and the bacterial pellets were stored at -20°C.


Spinning Image

Week 26

Finished up cloning and sequencing of the ELPs containing rapamycin-binding domains. In addition, we tried cloning the protein mNeonGreen, attached to a VGPIG[60] domain into a pBad vector. This fusion protein we will use later in characterizing our intracellular hydrogel. However, the plasmids we obtained unfortunately did not contain the desired insert.

The bacteria we froze last week were thawed and lysed with a 1:1 organic solvent mixture of ethanol and isopropanol. ELPs were then precipitated by adding acetonitrile to a final volume of 70% (v/v%), after which they were centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in cold MilliQ (MQ). Then a round of inverse transition cycling was done to further purify the ELPs. Here, the ELP solution is centrifuged at 12.000 rpm and 4°C for 15 min and the supernatant is collected. The solution is then warmed up to 25°C and saturated ammonium sulfate is added to precipitate the ELPs. centrifugation is done again at 25°C, after which the supernatant is discarded and the ELPs are resuspended at 4°C MQ. Finally, the solution (10 mL) was dyalized in 1L of cold MQ overnight, to remove any remaining salt.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 27

With our purified ELPs, we were finally able to test their ability to form a hydrogel. Since the yield of our protein was quite small, we decided to first attempt to make a 10 w/v% gel. After dissolving the ELPs in MilliQ water at 4°C, we observed that the fluid became quite viscous, but it remained transparent. Upon bringing it to RT, it became very turbid and upon closer inspection, we saw that the gel was formed. An image of the gel in a small container can be seen in the image below.


Spinning Image

Week 28

We also performed protein expression of the FRB and FKBP12-containing ELPs. However, FKBP12-A120-FKBP12 was not expressed successfully, as evidenced by the SDS-PAGE gel in the figure below containing the constructs before and after one round of inverse transition cycling. In slot 1, the FRB-A120-FRB construct is located, in slot 2 FKBP12-A120-FKBP12, which did not express, and in slot 3 FRB-A120-FKBP12.


arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 29

ELP solutions were made at low concentrations so that we could determine the transition temperatures of our ELPs using UV-vis. The results can be read on our Results Page. In addition, we upscaled our protein expression, so that we obtained some more ELPs to work with.


Spinning Image

Week 30

No experiments were planned as the team took a holiday this week.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 31

To determine if we can control the division of our cells and if they are still metabolically active, we tested them using a colony-forming assay and an assay in which a substrate, Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK8), is converted in living cells. More information about this experiment can be found on the Experiments Page and the Results Page. We compared cells in which protein expression was induced versus where no expression was induced and used ampicillin as a selection marker. The absorbance gave us an indication of how many cells were still alive and able to convert CCK8. In addition, we plated these bacteria onto LB-agar plates to see if they still managed to grow.


Spinning Image

Week 32

We performed the CCK8 assay again, since previous week the shaking incubator was turned off overnight, resulting in poor protein expression.

A new attempt was also made at cloning VPGIG[60]-mNeonGreen into the pBad vector.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 33

We wanted to test the different diffusion rates of a fluorescent dye when this was incorporated into the gels. Rhodamine B was used initially to test the diffusion rate. More about this can be read on our Results Page. However, when attempting to form the gel, it did not dissolve very well in the water containing rhodamine B. We figured this might be due to salt left over from doing ITC purification. Therefore, we tried purifying the ELPs by dialysis again to remove the salt.

After several failed attempts at cloning the I[60]-mNeonGreen gene into the pBAD vector, we tried a different strategy. We used BamHI-HF instead of BamHI, and we performed two single digestions, instead of one double digestion. This resulted in successful transformations. However, when we got the sequencing results, we found that the ELP sequences attached to mNeonGreen were not I[60], but A[3]G[2][12], therefore the protein is from here on reffered to as such.


Spinning Image

Week 34

After dialysis of the ELPs, they dissolved completely, even at very high concentrations. Thus, we were able to do the diffusion experiment using rhodamine B.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 35

Rhodamine B diffusion was also done for the 5% gel, where the concentration in the supernatant was measured every 2 hours. We also received our IL-10 gBlocks, which we first cloned into pET24a(+), as a back-up for when expression in the pBAD vector would not work.


Spinning Image

Week 36

Co-expression of A[3]G[2][12]-mNeonGreen and Z1-A120-Z2 was attempted again using different conditions. We tried inducing the hydrogel-forming ELPs by IPTG instead of AIM TB. In addition, we tried using AIM TB and adding arabinose at different time points. However, both strategies failed, which led us to believe the arabinose might somehow interfere with the expression of Z1-A120-Z2.

CCK8

The IL-10 constructs were cloned from the pET24a(+) vector into the pBad vector and samples were sent for sequencing. Only ompf-IL10 seemed to be successfully cloned, but since the project was nearing its end, we decided not to try to clone pelB-IL10 into pBad again. We then also performed (co-)transformations of Ompf-IL10 and Z1-A120-Z2 in BL21.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 37

We managed to co-express the Z1-A120-Z2 together with A[3]G[2][12]-mNeonGreen. We first let Z1-A120-Z2 express in AIM TB medium under the same conditions as for single expression. Then, we diluted the culture to OD600 = 0.6 in AIM TB medium containing arabinose (6.6 mM). This resulted in successful expression of A[3]G[2][12]-mNeonGreen as well.

We also performed new microscopy experiments, using a viability staining called Live-or-DyeTM. Using this dye, in combination with a Hoechst staining, we wanted to see if our cells would stay alive after being treated with ampicillin. However, since the results of this experiment were not conclusive, the data is not shown on the results page.

IL-10 expression was induced using the same conditions as for A[3]G[2][12]-mNeonGreen. Cultures were grown to OD600= 0.6 in TB medium, when arabinose was added to a final concentration of 6.6 mM following incubation at 37°C for 2h. Then, IL-10 was extracted using periplasmic extraction. This was done, because the native protein contains disulfide bridges, which can only be formed in the oxidizing environment of the periplasm. 10 mL of extraction buffer (0.2 M TRIS pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 20 w/v% sucrose, 0.1 mM PMSF, Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail) was added per 1 g of wet cell pellet and incubated for 30 min 4°C. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 12.000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, after which the supernatant, containg IL-10, was collected.


Spinning Image

Week 38

To put the bacteria in a pill, we needed to freeze-dry them. We made a setup for this in our biolab depicted in the image below. The setup seemed to work as intended. However, we were unable to freeze-dry the samples overnight, since we had to cool the setup using liquid nitrogen, which needed to be replenished every few hours. This unfortunately led to only two samples being sufficiently dried, whereas the others were not. Therefore, we only performed the CCK8 assay on the two dried samples. The setup used can be seen in the image below:

We also performed an assay provided by Promega, the LumitTM IL-10 immunoassay. This assay would give us the ability to quantify the levels of IL-10 expression in the BL21 E. coli. You can read more about it on our Results Page.

arrow
arrow
Spinning Image

Week 39

We did the CCK8 assay for the freeze-dried samples and we also tested the gelated bacteria for resistance under oxidative conditions by incubating them with different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. The viability of the bacteria was then also tested using the CCK8 assay.

As a final experiment, we co-expressed Z1-A120-Z2 with A[3]G[2][12]-mNeonGreen and used these samples to do Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) on. This gave us an insight into the diffusion of the fluorescent molecule through the bacteria. The results from the experiment can be seen on our Results Page.